Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 01:22:57PM -0800, Matthew Dobson wrote:
> 
>>Jesse had acked the patch in an earlier itteration.  The only thing 
>>that's changed is some line offsets whilst porting the patch forward.
>>
>>Jesse (or anyone else?), any objections to this patch as a superset of 
>>yours?
> 
> 
> No objections here.  Of course, you'll have to rediff against the
> current tree since that stuff has been merged for awhile now.  On a
> somewhat related note, Martin mentioned that he'd like to get rid of
> memblks.  I'm all for that too; they just seem to get in the way.
> 
> Jesse
> 

Yeah... didn't actually attatch the patch to that last email, did I? 
Brain slowly transitioning back into "on" mode after a couple weeks 
solidly in the "off" position.

-Matt