From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=95.215.58.62 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793373240; b=K12n7foLEbuxgTImcb1lfw1WyCUfxL7fReDEbzF6s0bovTGV0LE6Lf442WpPIoJHd8jZ 0+DFGrpF8/8uNb53ZrNAlFzEIeOON9BUEugxVngk0KAI8luIbc8IBlhPVIrXvKN5mvHjb 962+h8fO9vCZ9WyCB4HYGEaDhoJWndwZZNS+ftFzyrjGII6N1cTyDbZXJwBb7m145M9bC KnFozHgNOVuIbOhptE1e5F4ATLBz7smh2kEDdfisgDA6gj/gMVPmN2qUHNUuQy7NzZyCf DW9oUKYo9HsmvvCrbat2Cl8GsXq2N660x9hnfKmrDCo6BMxEk6J2VsxfM++bItqx4IQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793373240; h=DMARC-Filter:X-Envelope-To:DKIM-Signature:X-Envelope-To:Received: X-Mizu-Trace-ID:X-Migadu-Flow:MIME-Version:Date:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Message-ID:TLS-Required:Subject:To:Cc: In-Reply-To:References; bh=6uRPTLAAPB5LpFRFm556jUuMMOe80x68STRxPhrcY/E=; b=fZy9xtd/0lesxcW67KdA4jKr05Rg4WlNUEiYvd44MEQoP0gmGhNqKyPpCgIXyD97GUhE Wkq1cXk4B5CpJn9kU01331sSlnkzUdqe0xxqNUc/oWthmx4T2croBOKRRVYRCSc0gJPaD 8/QGeiLyRXESIHk8zPJkAMB/qEvSemceefWTfoqi8TxcjKEK1t5BYEUZc1bfqGjQ1kll7 89BvMJw6TL/+3/AYMAXkDdUBJW/dmDXm0HNaWsCQ6O0JLMnoR90imJkxwhNgk3LHNEeii rpJQ4LcJKb14XDh9bL9O+n0AG0GYw08yJzLHnsTP7Ebcr08EDR89JLcoB5ic8FZrWlQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=L5YyNOdy; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=95.215.58.62 Received: from mta1.migadu.com (out-62.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.62]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CE5860A3815 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2026 15:13:58 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 8CE5860A3815 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=L5YyNOdy X-Envelope-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=oKPbqXqkGObkrDmdt1bVlbSpHSviwwvJZLv7o60QC6Q=; c=simple/simple; d=linux.dev; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1793373236; v=1; x=1793978036; b=L5YyNOdyt9RpjFwjNr8yyfOoninOmluWKpimRgRa80g+9aOsILdOif5pyiwKuXhhKi2XuSYY XyJQgUITRsZ2LTj9sKMhKbXVxEYOWtJGj0uBTZ7XOfN0S7yplskY/TbwPjslEdV/F/2OZ7glya8 Q2qp7XQnUjDN/63a88cHwxD4= X-Envelope-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Received: by smtp.migadu.com with ESMTPS id 104ed7a153b02233; Fri, 30 Oct 2026 15:13:56 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: 104ed7a153b02233 X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 15:13:55 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Luka Gejak" Message-ID: <3a48ce3d110a35e7b6683ea3228340fbaef445d4@linux.dev> TLS-Required: No Subject: Re: [PATCH rtw-next v2] wifi: rtw88: usb: don't report the aggregation buffer as a frame To: "Ho Jie Feng" , "Ping-Ke Shih" Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "Ho Jie Feng" , "Kalle Valo" , "Hans Ulli Kroll" , "neo_jou" , "Sascha Hauer" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261030034649.300288-1-hjf3108@gmail.com> References: <20261030034649.300288-1-hjf3108@gmail.com> Hi Jie Feng, Thanks for the v2. The fix looks right to me, just one small comment below. October 30, 2026 at 4:46 AM, "Ho Jie Feng" wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/usb.c b/drivers/net/wir= eless/realtek/rtw88/usb.c > index 715a2ce342d92..d6ad0770657d7 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/usb.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/usb.c > @@ -342,6 +342,11 @@ static void rtw_usb_write_port_tx_complete(struct = urb *urb) > > skb_pull(skb, rtwdev->chip->tx_pkt_desc_sz); > > + if (tx_data->drv_frame) { > + dev_kfree_skb_any(skb); > + continue; > + } > + As far as I can see this is the normal TX completion of the aggregate buffer, so I think dev_consume_skb_any() fits better here. dev_kfree_skb_any() frees it with SKB_DROP_REASON_NOT_SPECIFIED, so each aggregated transfer would now show up as a drop in the skb:kfree_skb tracepoint and in drop monitor. Before this patch the buffer went through mac80211, which in the usual case freed it with dev_kfree_skb(), and that is consume_skb(). Best regards, Luka Gejak