From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73B7B2DEA9D for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 10:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.188 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755685202; cv=none; b=GDyTnuzypaCA8i8fpZ3lKXHaxR3P2BdP+6hQG7m2a669oCyP6UneKkcAH0lzsHhfsYdb9xoZrg0qWcaHgkxV189owQRrH19+0gpzk9Gt/s/H0/aEMMxyecEe28jLrwo1zCMbs9dnRMyE1rULRsVeaVWHfg1jllLDOPYWVx5wXvY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755685202; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ixt4MI8sNyddrirHCmjXmC66O0F6v4cBEiLL8VcL9OQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=JWTU8IDc2DI40pex1/a57j/ohJTnAom7QnNWe1NhFaSR67dzdoDKroJv9MehWE5HzYJNq6BC/W74b4XdTOYgkv8eFWjHLe3vAz96ODgKJduiK/MfYZF4oyiuvXX1j6yNYGvoLQwZjdkL7rocShlo4tf9W6gdKWzq4Q/KD1VhzY0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.188 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.162.254]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4c6Mqk1B1zztT9v; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 18:18:58 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemf200018.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.31]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B2AD180485; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 18:19:57 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.176.250] (10.174.176.250) by dggpemf200018.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 18:19:56 +0800 Message-ID: <3a894ee7-0d07-496a-bbb8-abcc431b849b@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 18:19:55 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH -next 00/16] mm/damon: support ARM32 with LPAE To: SeongJae Park CC: , , , , , References: <20250814160429.67476-1-sj@kernel.org> From: Quanmin Yan In-Reply-To: <20250814160429.67476-1-sj@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: kwepems100002.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.206) To dggpemf200018.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.31) Hi SJ, 在 2025/8/15 0:04, SeongJae Park 写道: > On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 22:07:12 +0800 Quanmin Yan wrote: > >> Hi SJ, >> >> Thank you for your detailed suggestions on the patch series. Please allow me >> some time to thoroughly review each of your recommendations. > No worry, please take your time :) > >> I haven’t responded >> to every point immediately because I’d like to first attempt updating the patches >> accordingly. If I encounter any questions or issues during the process, I’ll promptly >> reach out to discuss them with you, very appreciate your patience and guidance. > Sounds good. > >> By the way, this patch series is based on linux-next(commit:2674d1eadaa2). > Thank you for sharing this. From the next time, please use mm-new[1] as a > baseline for DAMON patches if there is no reason to not do so. > > [1] https://origin.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/mm/damon/maintainer-profile.html#scm-trees I've prepared the v2 patch set based on the mm-new branch[1]. Your valuable feedback would be greatly appreciated! [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250820080623.3799131-1-yanquanmin1@huawei.com/ Thanks, Quanmin Yan