mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@gmail.com>,
	Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: add missing ASSERT for system space_info in reserve_chunk_space
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 10:02:00 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3a9648fa-49c2-4f07-84ee-50a1c7d7196f@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260108194502.653-1-jiashengjiangcool@gmail.com>



在 2026/1/9 06:15, Jiasheng Jiang 写道:
> In reserve_chunk_space(), btrfs_find_space_info() is called to retrieve
> the space_info for the SYSTEM block group. However, the returned pointer
> is immediately dereferenced by spin_lock(&info->lock) without validation.
> 
> While the SYSTEM space_info is expected to be present during normal
> operations, direct dereference without checking creates a risk of a
> null pointer dereference. This deviates from the coding pattern seen
> in peer functions like btrfs_chunk_alloc() where such returns are
> validated with an ASSERT.
> 
> Add an ASSERT() to ensure the pointer is valid before access, improving
> code robustness and consistency with the rest of the block-group logic.

If you know how system chunk works, you must understand without a system 
chunk a btrfs will never be mounted.

The ASSERT() looks unnecessary to me.

Thanks,
Qu

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@gmail.com>
> ---
>   fs/btrfs/block-group.c | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
> index 08b14449fabe..f4229ee4f573 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
> @@ -4313,6 +4313,7 @@ static void reserve_chunk_space(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>   	lockdep_assert_held(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
>   
>   	info = btrfs_find_space_info(fs_info, BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM);
> +	ASSERT(info);
>   	spin_lock(&info->lock);
>   	left = info->total_bytes - btrfs_space_info_used(info, true);
>   	spin_unlock(&info->lock);


  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-08 23:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-08 19:45 Jiasheng Jiang
2026-01-08 23:32 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2026-01-09 15:17   ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3a9648fa-49c2-4f07-84ee-50a1c7d7196f@suse.com \
    --to=wqu@suse.com \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=jiashengjiangcool@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®