From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>, Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa-dev@sang-engineering.com>
Cc: lkp@intel.com, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/22] gpio: protect the pointer to gpio_chip in gpio_device with SRCU
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 08:03:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ab71aad-757f-4d5e-ac09-fdad75238fa3@moroto.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240130124828.14678-21-brgl@bgdev.pl>
Hi Bartosz,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Bartosz-Golaszewski/gpio-protect-the-list-of-GPIO-devices-with-SRCU/20240130-205537
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brgl/linux.git gpio/for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240130124828.14678-21-brgl%40bgdev.pl
patch subject: [PATCH 20/22] gpio: protect the pointer to gpio_chip in gpio_device with SRCU
config: i386-randconfig-141-20240131 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240201/202402010641.idtEaO24-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202402010641.idtEaO24-lkp@intel.com/
New smatch warnings:
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:4776 gpiolib_dbg_show() error: we previously assumed 'gc' could be null (see line 4773)
vim +/gc +4776 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
fdeb8e1547cb9d Linus Walleij 2016-02-10 4762 static void gpiolib_dbg_show(struct seq_file *s, struct gpio_device *gdev)
d2876d08d86f22 David Brownell 2008-02-04 4763 {
0338f6a6fb659f Bartosz Golaszewski 2023-12-21 4764 bool active_low, is_irq, is_out;
0338f6a6fb659f Bartosz Golaszewski 2023-12-21 4765 unsigned int gpio = gdev->base;
3de69ae1c407da Andy Shevchenko 2022-04-08 4766 struct gpio_desc *desc;
2796d5332f8ac8 Bartosz Golaszewski 2024-01-30 4767 struct gpio_chip *gc;
3de69ae1c407da Andy Shevchenko 2022-04-08 4768 int value;
d2876d08d86f22 David Brownell 2008-02-04 4769
2796d5332f8ac8 Bartosz Golaszewski 2024-01-30 4770 guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu);
2796d5332f8ac8 Bartosz Golaszewski 2024-01-30 4771
2796d5332f8ac8 Bartosz Golaszewski 2024-01-30 4772 gc = rcu_dereference(gdev->chip);
2796d5332f8ac8 Bartosz Golaszewski 2024-01-30 @4773 if (!gc)
^^^
The patch adds a NULL check
2796d5332f8ac8 Bartosz Golaszewski 2024-01-30 4774 seq_puts(s, "Underlying GPIO chip is gone\n");
2796d5332f8ac8 Bartosz Golaszewski 2024-01-30 4775
3de69ae1c407da Andy Shevchenko 2022-04-08 @4776 for_each_gpio_desc(gc, desc) {
^^
But this dereference isn't checked... Probably it should return after
the seq_puts().
bedc56b1695b27 Bartosz Golaszewski 2024-01-30 4777 guard(srcu)(&desc->srcu);
3de69ae1c407da Andy Shevchenko 2022-04-08 4778 if (test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags)) {
3de69ae1c407da Andy Shevchenko 2022-04-08 4779 gpiod_get_direction(desc);
3de69ae1c407da Andy Shevchenko 2022-04-08 4780 is_out = test_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT, &desc->flags);
234c52097ce416 Andy Shevchenko 2022-04-08 4781 value = gpio_chip_get_value(gc, desc);
3de69ae1c407da Andy Shevchenko 2022-04-08 4782 is_irq = test_bit(FLAG_USED_AS_IRQ, &desc->flags);
3de69ae1c407da Andy Shevchenko 2022-04-08 4783 active_low = test_bit(FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW, &desc->flags);
3de69ae1c407da Andy Shevchenko 2022-04-08 4784 seq_printf(s, " gpio-%-3d (%-20.20s|%-20.20s) %s %s %s%s\n",
32648f473c7f46 Bartosz Golaszewski 2024-01-30 4785 gpio, desc->name ?: "", gpiod_get_label(desc),
d2876d08d86f22 David Brownell 2008-02-04 4786 is_out ? "out" : "in ",
3de69ae1c407da Andy Shevchenko 2022-04-08 4787 value >= 0 ? (value ? "hi" : "lo") : "? ",
90fd227029a25b Linus Walleij 2018-10-01 4788 is_irq ? "IRQ " : "",
90fd227029a25b Linus Walleij 2018-10-01 4789 active_low ? "ACTIVE LOW" : "");
3de69ae1c407da Andy Shevchenko 2022-04-08 4790 } else if (desc->name) {
3de69ae1c407da Andy Shevchenko 2022-04-08 4791 seq_printf(s, " gpio-%-3d (%-20.20s)\n", gpio, desc->name);
3de69ae1c407da Andy Shevchenko 2022-04-08 4792 }
3de69ae1c407da Andy Shevchenko 2022-04-08 4793
3de69ae1c407da Andy Shevchenko 2022-04-08 4794 gpio++;
d2876d08d86f22 David Brownell 2008-02-04 4795 }
d2876d08d86f22 David Brownell 2008-02-04 4796 }
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-01 5:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-30 12:48 [PATCH 00/22] gpio: rework locking and object life-time control Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 01/22] gpio: protect the list of GPIO devices with SRCU Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 9:34 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-31 12:45 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 15:01 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 02/22] gpio: of: assign and read the hog pointer atomically Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 17:38 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 03/22] gpio: remove unused logging helpers Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 17:39 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-31 18:08 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:33 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 04/22] gpio: provide and use gpiod_get_label() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 19:36 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 05/22] gpio: don't set label from irq helpers Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 19:38 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 06/22] gpio: add SRCU infrastructure to struct gpio_desc Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 19:35 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 07/22] gpio: protect the descriptor label with SRCU Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 19:41 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 08/22] gpio: sysfs: use gpio_device_find() to iterate over existing devices Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 19:42 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 09/22] gpio: remove gpio_lock Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 19:51 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 10/22] gpio: reinforce desc->flags handling Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:01 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-31 20:35 ` Linus Walleij
2024-02-01 18:30 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 11/22] gpio: remove unneeded code from gpio_device_get_desc() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:02 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 12/22] gpio: sysfs: extend the critical section for unregistering sysfs devices Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:06 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 13/22] gpio: sysfs: pass the GPIO device - not chip - to sysfs callbacks Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:09 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 14/22] gpio: cdev: replace gpiochip_get_desc() with gpio_device_get_desc() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:10 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 15/22] gpio: cdev: don't access gdev->chip if it's not needed Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:11 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 16/22] gpio: reduce the functionality of validate_desc() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:16 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-31 20:19 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 17/22] gpio: remove unnecessary checks from gpiod_to_chip() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 18/22] gpio: add the can_sleep flag to struct gpio_device Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:17 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 19/22] gpio: add SRCU infrastructure " Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 20/22] gpio: protect the pointer to gpio_chip in gpio_device with SRCU Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 0:41 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-31 8:15 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 2:20 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-31 9:02 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 9:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-01-31 9:28 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 9:41 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 9:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-01-31 10:17 ` brgl
2024-01-31 11:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-01-31 12:23 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:23 ` Linus Walleij
2024-02-01 5:03 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2024-02-01 7:57 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 21/22] gpio: remove the RW semaphore from the GPIO device Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:24 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 22/22] gpio: mark unsafe gpio_chip manipulators as deprecated Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:29 ` Linus Walleij
2024-02-01 9:14 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:32 ` [PATCH 00/22] gpio: rework locking and object life-time control Linus Walleij
2024-02-01 8:43 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3ab71aad-757f-4d5e-ac09-fdad75238fa3@moroto.mountain \
--to=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=elder@linaro.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
--cc=wsa-dev@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®