From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB230C4332F for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15746056B for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235431AbhJKJOZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:14:25 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55612 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235366AbhJKJOX (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:14:23 -0400 Received: from mail1.systemli.org (mail1.systemli.org [IPv6:2a00:c38:11e:ffff::a032]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04031C061570; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 02:12:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3ac87582-2a7f-6885-4f5b-c8c91b0a02cb@systemli.org> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=systemli.org; s=default; t=1633943540; bh=o/bmAh+lFIOgkU05licr7Un7614a5LZil6pEm849YPw=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=8Y56/Gnb6eHy22GdeeNo71WIjXrnqs3efWarX4x9QiBqcLkP+soH8DKtXz1C7B+Ho 1CqahENdPatUjVZUT2vEkhDUfa7iVm/c9BsFauST07I8+HAfpgP7oe4BfayHTNGKX2 Z5Jz0qEAlUvMqb2GgAAjnbzRGGIo10Ob9UWnRMk6ErtnCEwQ0srU4T7jsr/GYmVyJP qBpHjVr0hDpWWf6aNLTBWopiWexQslzq8sfn6MMY47gW+it8fs51jP8+OA1uAyQtlA cfpMIHI3A4S5EshowSn/pWJhBeDVLce1k2KExuzxwfrKpXnpAm4TJVU9NAHHp9U1LV CDm/Nw+VzDhgA== Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:12:16 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC v2] mt76: mt7615: mt7622: fix ibss and meshpoint Content-Language: en-US To: Daniel Golle Cc: Kalle Valo , nbd@nbd.name, lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com, ryder.lee@mediatek.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, sean.wang@mediatek.com, shayne.chen@mediatek.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Foss References: <20211007225725.2615-1-vincent@systemli.org> <87czoe61kh.fsf@codeaurora.org> <274013cd-29e4-9202-423b-bd2b2222d6b8@systemli.org> From: Nick In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org My tests on todays OpenWrt Trunk with my and without my patch showed: - MT7622: AP + AdHoc (only AP is working, in every case) - BPI-MT7615: AP + AdHoc (with and without my patch still works). I thought something would change if I apply my patch with the HW-Addresses. However everything stays the same: With my patch: AdHoc: Shenzhen_4e:4b:dd (38:83:9a:4e:4b:dd) AP: address: 3a:83:9a:4e:4b:dd (3a:83:9a:4e:4b:dd) Without my patch: AdHoc: Shenzhen_4e:4b:dd (38:83:9a:4e:4b:dd) AP: 3a:83:9a:4e:4b:dd (3a:83:9a:4e:4b:dd) Bests Nick On 10/9/21 15:22, Daniel Golle wrote: > On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 12:37:53PM +0200, Nick wrote: >> On 10/9/21 10:32, Kalle Valo wrote: >> >>> Nick Hainke writes: >>> >>>> Fixes: d8d59f66d136 ("mt76: mt7615: support 16 interfaces"). >>> The fixes tag should be in the end, before Signed-off-by tags. But I can >>> fix that during commit. >> Thanks for feedback. Already changed that locally but I did not want to spam >> you with another RFC v3. :) >> I was able to organize me a BPI-MT7615 PCIE Express Card. With and without >> this patch beacons were sent on the mt7615 pcie, so the patch did not make >> any difference. However, the mt7622 wifi will only work with my patch. > Does Mesh+AP or Ad-Hoc+AP also work on MT7622 and does it still work on > MT7615E card with your patch applied?