From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] ACPI: scan: Honor certain device identification rules
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 16:27:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ad75583-b37e-8700-d062-42426966d912@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11860508.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher>
Hi,
On 10/26/21 20:51, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> There are some rules in the ACPI spec regarding which device identification
> objects can be used together etc., but they are not followed by the kernel
> code.
>
> This series modifies the code to follow the spec more closely (see patch
> changelogs for details).
Both changes seem sensible to me; and since you make _HID take precedence
over _ADR I don't expect this to cause any regressions on BYT / CHT
hardware (the other way around will likely be an issue).
So for the series:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Regards,
Hans
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-27 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-26 18:51 Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-10-26 18:57 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI: scan: Do not add device IDs from _CID if _HID is not valid Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-10-26 19:00 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] ACPI: scan: Do not set type.bus_address if _HID is valid Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-10-26 19:33 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] ACPI: scan: Honor certain device identification rules Andy Shevchenko
2021-10-27 17:34 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-10-27 17:50 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-10-27 18:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-10-27 18:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-10-27 19:28 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-10-27 14:27 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3ad75583-b37e-8700-d062-42426966d912@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®