mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Ionut Nechita (Wind River)" <ionut.nechita@windriver.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Cc: tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, baoquan.he@linux.dev, rppt@kernel.org,
	pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, pratyush@kernel.org,
	ruirui.yang@linux.dev, eric.devolder@oracle.com,
	hbathini@linux.ibm.com, ruanjinjie@huawei.com, include@grrlz.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/crash: reserve elfcorehdr for CONFIG_NR_CPUS, not CONFIG_NR_CPUS_DEFAULT
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 10:34:27 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b340caa-d573-43c3-bf18-7ae6f5879627@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260825075043.42041-2-ionut.nechita@windriver.com>



On 25/08/26 13:20, Ionut Nechita (Wind River) wrote:
> From: Ionut Nechita <ionut.nechita@windriver.com>
>
> kexec_file_load(2) fails with -EINVAL when loading a crash kernel on a
> machine whose number of possible CPUs exceeds CONFIG_NR_CPUS_DEFAULT,
> even though the classic kexec_load(2) path succeeds on the same machine.

It was surprising because the kexec tool with kexec_load also uses the
same size for elfcorehdr, which is exported via 
/sys/kernel/crash_elfcorehdr_size.

Code snippet from load_crashdump_segments() - 
kexec/arch/i386/crashdump-x86.c:

|/* For hotplug suppoBut I think we should handle the above issue 
separately.rt, override the minimum necessary size just * computed with 
the value from /sys/kernel/crash_elfcorehdr_size. * Properly align the 
size as well. */ if (do_hotplug) { memsz = _ALIGN(elfcorehdrsz, align); }|

Then I found the following code in add_segment_phys_virt() - kexec/kexec.c:

|if (bufsz > memsz) { bufsz = memsz; }|

when adding the segment. This seems wrong to me. What is the point of 
finding
a memory hole smaller than bufsz? It seems like it should be memsz = 
bufsz instead.

This could be the reason you don't see the problem with the kexec_load 
system call.
The kexec tool is truncating bufsz while finding a hole of size memsz.

So, yes, you didn't observe this issue with the kexec_load syscall while 
loading the
kdump kernel. However, given that the elfcorehdr memsz is truncated, you 
may face
problems during dump collection or with the collected dump.

Another problem I see around setting memsz when crash hotplug support is 
enabled
in both the kernel and kexec tool is that memsz is being overridden 
without checking
its current size.

It is possible that the elfcorehdr buffer prepared by the kernel could 
be larger than the
size calculated statically from the kernel configuration.

So I think if kbuf.bufsz for elfcorehdr is larger than (pnum + 1) * 
(sizeof(Elf64_Phdr) , we
should skip updating kbuf.memsz.

With that said the changes introduce here looks good, so feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>

But I think we should handle the above issues separately.

- Sourabh Jain
>
> With CONFIG_CRASH_HOTPLUG=y the elfcorehdr segment is over-allocated so
> it can be updated in place on CPU/memory hotplug.  On the
> !CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG path, crash_load_segments() sizes that
> reservation as:
>
> 	ret = crash_prepare_headers(..., &kbuf.bufsz, &pnum);
> 	...
> 	pnum += 2 + CONFIG_NR_CPUS_DEFAULT;
>
> The value that lands in @pnum is crash_prepare_headers()'s
> @nr_mem_ranges out parameter, i.e. cmem->nr_ranges - the number of
> memory ranges only, not a phdr count.  The header that
> crash_prepare_elf64_headers() actually builds adds one phdr per
> *possible* CPU on top of those ranges:
>
> 	nr_phdr = nr_cpus + 1;		/* + vmcoreinfo */
> 	nr_phdr += mem->nr_ranges;
> 	nr_phdr++;			/* + kernel text map */
>
> So the reservation covers
>
> 	nr_ranges + 2 + CONFIG_NR_CPUS_DEFAULT
>
> phdrs while the buffer holds
>
> 	nr_ranges + 2 + num_possible_cpus()
>
> phdrs, and the buffer exceeds the reservation by
>
> 	(num_possible_cpus() - CONFIG_NR_CPUS_DEFAULT) * sizeof(Elf64_Phdr)
>
> bytes as soon as num_possible_cpus() grows past CONFIG_NR_CPUS_DEFAULT.
> num_possible_cpus() is bounded by CONFIG_NR_CPUS, not by
> CONFIG_NR_CPUS_DEFAULT, so this is reachable on any config that raises
> CONFIG_NR_CPUS above the arch default without CONFIG_MAXSMP.
>
> crash_prepare_elf64_headers() rounds bufsz up to ELF_CORE_HEADER_ALIGN
> and kexec_add_buffer() rounds memsz up to PAGE_SIZE (both 4096), so the
> excess is invisible until it outgrows that padding.  Once it does,
> sanity_check_segment_list() rejects the image:
>
> 	if (image->segment[i].bufsz > image->segment[i].memsz)
> 		return -EINVAL;
>
> kexec_load(2) is unaffected because user space builds the elfcorehdr
> without the hotplug over-allocation.
>
> Observed on a single-socket Xeon 6776P (144 possible CPUs) running a
> PREEMPT_RT kernel with:
>
> 	# CONFIG_MAXSMP is not set
> 	# CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG is not set
> 	CONFIG_NR_CPUS_RANGE_BEGIN=2
> 	CONFIG_NR_CPUS_RANGE_END=512
> 	CONFIG_NR_CPUS_DEFAULT=64
> 	CONFIG_NR_CPUS=256
>
> At 144 possible CPUs the buffer exceeds the reservation by
> (144 - 64) * 56 = 4480 bytes.  That is more than the 4096 bytes of page
> padding, so the overflow is guaranteed and kexec -p -s fails with
> "kexec_file_load failed: Invalid argument".  Reducing the possible CPU
> count to 72 leaves an excess of (72 - 64) * 56 = 448 bytes, which the
> page rounding still absorbs, and the load succeeds - confirming the
> reservation is the limiting factor.
>
> Reserve the elfcorehdr for CONFIG_NR_CPUS, the compile-time upper bound
> of num_possible_cpus(), so the reservation always covers the header that
> is actually generated.
>
> The CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=y path discards @pnum and reserves
> 2 + CONFIG_NR_CPUS_DEFAULT + CONFIG_CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES phdrs
> instead.  With the default CONFIG_CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES=8192 the
> memory range allowance dwarfs the CPU shortfall, so that path does not
> fail in practice; it is switched to CONFIG_NR_CPUS as well for
> consistency and to stay correct for small CONFIG_CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES
> values.
>
> This does not change the reservation for defconfig-like builds, since
> CONFIG_NR_CPUS defaults to CONFIG_NR_CPUS_DEFAULT.  Only configs that
> raise CONFIG_NR_CPUS reserve more, and the worst case is bounded by the
> top of the range (CONFIG_NR_CPUS=8192 with CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y),
> which is exactly what CONFIG_MAXSMP already reserves today.
>
> Fixes: ea53ad9cf73b ("x86/crash: add x86 crash hotplug support")
> Signed-off-by: Ionut Nechita <ionut.nechita@windriver.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Bradley Morgan <include@grrlz.net>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kernel/crash.c | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c b/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c
> index e681ec9cf1dc..e6f23933a6df 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c
> @@ -369,9 +369,9 @@ int crash_load_segments(struct kimage *image)
>   	 * maximum CPUs and maximum memory ranges.
>   	 */
>   	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG))
> -		pnum = 2 + CONFIG_NR_CPUS_DEFAULT + CONFIG_CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES;
> +		pnum = 2 + CONFIG_NR_CPUS + CONFIG_CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES;
>   	else
> -		pnum += 2 + CONFIG_NR_CPUS_DEFAULT;
> +		pnum += 2 + CONFIG_NR_CPUS;
>   
>   	if (pnum < (unsigned long)PN_XNUM) {
>   		kbuf.memsz = pnum * sizeof(Elf64_Phdr);
> @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ unsigned int arch_crash_get_elfcorehdr_size(void)
>   	unsigned int sz;
>   
>   	/* kernel_map, VMCOREINFO and maximum CPUs */
> -	sz = 2 + CONFIG_NR_CPUS_DEFAULT;
> +	sz = 2 + CONFIG_NR_CPUS;
>   	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG))
>   		sz += CONFIG_CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES;
>   	sz *= sizeof(Elf64_Phdr);
>
> base-commit: 4b18edbd8e70f7e6860d56370f13244896d0f95c


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-26  5:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-25  7:50 [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/crash: fix kexec_file_load(2) -EINVAL on machines with many possible CPUs Ionut Nechita (Wind River)
2026-08-25  7:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/crash: reserve elfcorehdr for CONFIG_NR_CPUS, not CONFIG_NR_CPUS_DEFAULT Ionut Nechita (Wind River)
2026-08-25  8:26   ` Baoquan He
2026-08-26  5:04   ` Sourabh Jain [this message]
2026-08-25  7:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] crash: update stale NR_CPUS_DEFAULT references in elfcorehdr sizing docs Ionut Nechita (Wind River)
2026-08-25 13:07   ` Bradley Morgan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3b340caa-d573-43c3-bf18-7ae6f5879627@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eric.devolder@oracle.com \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=include@grrlz.net \
    --cc=ionut.nechita@windriver.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=ruirui.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®