mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched, mm: Optimize current_gfp_context()
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 19:32:52 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b353d6a-8430-b847-6ddd-21189c87ef6b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200811152921.1d43e34ad7aff928c6c1267f@linux-foundation.org>

On 8/11/20 6:29 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 17:29:36 -0400 Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> The current_gfp_context() converts a number of PF_MEMALLOC_* per-process
>> flags into the corresponding GFP_* flags for memory allocation. In
>> that function, current->flags is accessed 3 times. That may lead to
>> duplicated access of the same memory location.
>>
>> This is not usually a problem with minimal debug config options on as the
>> compiler can optimize away the duplicated memory accesses.  With most
>> of the debug config options on, however, that may not be the case.
>> For example, the x86-64 object size of the __need_fs_reclaim() in a
>> debug kernel that calls current_gfp_context() was 309 bytes. With this
>> patch applied, the object size is reduced to 202 bytes. This is a saving
>> of 107 bytes and will probably be slightly faster too.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
>> @@ -181,18 +181,20 @@ static inline bool in_vfork(struct task_struct *tsk)
>>    */
>>   static inline gfp_t current_gfp_context(gfp_t flags)
>>   {
>> -	if (unlikely(current->flags &
>> +	unsigned int pflags = READ_ONCE(current->flags);
> Why use READ_ONCE() here?

It was a change suggested by PeterZ. He said without the READ_ONCE(), 
the compiler may still choose to access current->flags multiple times 
instead of just reading it once. I think he is right and so I made the 
change.

Cheers,
Longman


  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-11 23:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-18 21:29 Waiman Long
2020-08-11 22:29 ` Andrew Morton
2020-08-11 23:32   ` Waiman Long [this message]
2020-09-18  6:44   ` Xu, Yanfei
2020-09-18 15:18     ` Waiman Long
2020-09-19 14:55       ` Xu, Yanfei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3b353d6a-8430-b847-6ddd-21189c87ef6b@redhat.com \
    --to=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®