From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15ABC433F5 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 20:22:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCFE60F4F for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 20:22:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235552AbhKLUZM (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Nov 2021 15:25:12 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36932 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230235AbhKLUZK (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Nov 2021 15:25:10 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C482C061766 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 12:22:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id c4so17525554wrd.9 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 12:22:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :references:cc:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=W0zH8OiTHGAxAnGVVdOKIHrQfR0Wun9xK3Ethxqbz6Y=; b=pZCga+eLwofBx0VUiUmCPLbm+Q+cvQyze7gVvvpOBme6fX7v22wihb6WybVXJ6XXqJ i6ULqTxbE1Wrq4T/ISFZUkzEwMaJfEkV8LZNowkv46Nf41Q6JPtRO5jHxGbRW3uRcbfZ 9qB6zOy/9BSuPtXnhhqG2aunixJjuIgXXXT8zQmyycLkw+ld8p6wcJUUur9v/bfsWKhZ Li4ZaVs87EmsQMaybyJZ7g8ztPXpO8HwTInlsH//BZQc/Xqi2nHN8x5/HeFNo8eLEQRk PJ9HLfgLvo/GW90TPooihqHpGedy3PEGJYyvGjmfgmN1vhQu+jq99wudWOygtYJXx53K SLlQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:cc:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=W0zH8OiTHGAxAnGVVdOKIHrQfR0Wun9xK3Ethxqbz6Y=; b=wI+p/1rHydMvMu2mdWcibnw82OzLA3QykuD3NQpatNTgmDh5y8i4I039NSM4yqxVy5 +OaYTz8ijnAdxj4dQtl6j0h6o2CZ9AUnG/E8uMTU1urLUsEaebCTq5KfxXHU4p6MQ59i nmwi7hT9CAU4ZTiQsknfifQeLmkFHYsTf4kqSR3Lnpj3x9c3t8L8o/koDqGHYgRDKC6U XOK5o/2NdBtnYvr82vD4AxmWcf57+Acnr2PhImHz3/tLN3kZ6pvJ+kfvUfytwtw9CA1c +o68y4fyHHyNMMmHieXEDjGgDSeB1yhkZYHvXb1VxVo4Iuvu4PFVLYtzXTbyKGi/z3wB pnYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530WRFBsRBWENOkjqJ+uQwB6ez2UrapdFUWkJ4TWKuZjpfRXA+mn x+3x1gz71xLC37o3mB7kEbY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzK+js5lOwqD8E6HkSiOMZz+Ab4hZXD9OseSnCy+Nji12qPQESoIIo3CBo+TlhnVcuFyhF5JQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fe4f:: with SMTP id m15mr21209354wrs.81.1636748538061; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 12:22:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.168.10.170] ([170.253.36.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q26sm6536794wrc.39.2021.11.12.12.22.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Nov 2021 12:22:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3b458eb5-42c2-50b2-cd42-ea9aba68210a@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 21:22:16 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Subject: Re: [Bug 214873] man 2 fsync implies possibility to return early Content-Language: en-US To: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, Jens Axboe References: Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Al Viro , David Howells , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Add CCs] Hi Jens, On 11/8/21 00:24, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214873 > > sworddragon2@gmail.com changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED > Resolution|INVALID |--- > > --- Comment #5 from sworddragon2@gmail.com --- > This ticket was closed pretty fast after comment #2 so I could not write > comment #4 before closing this ticket and now it seems due to it being closed > it does not receive attention anymore. Thus I'm reopening this ticket so that > comment #4 can be evaluated if this makes changes to the manpage valid. > > But if you think there is really nothing that needs to be changed feel free to > close this ticket again as I then won't bother about it here anymore. > That comment (and the previous) was directed to you, but since you're not CCd in this bugzilla issue, you didn't receive it. Could you please have a look at it. I also CCd the same other emails as in my previous email, since some of them may want to have a look at it too. Thanks, Alex -- Alejandro Colomar Linux man-pages comaintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/