From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49763C04AB1 for ; Sat, 11 May 2019 15:52:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B5A42173B for ; Sat, 11 May 2019 15:52:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="s0FzKNSd" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728681AbfEKPw4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 May 2019 11:52:56 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f66.google.com ([209.85.128.66]:33351 "EHLO mail-wm1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728636AbfEKPwz (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 May 2019 11:52:55 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f66.google.com with SMTP id c66so3206172wme.0 for ; Sat, 11 May 2019 08:52:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wPE7oz9+/ykS8zKoedHqVltx9asTMcwNqU/NkoJcdcY=; b=s0FzKNSdOBwo0GMStdjIpty4uA5mj8FO72cIPIiYgPgYd35EBRX9ZiG8D0YFnvU2+t VYwKiZ1P/isFku880QbFIILYQg3OhxyqzDJdkmfWwJRUDidN4S9lzNq8KB4rICYtC4I4 S2Q3K/YunQWelvK80PpWUzRAXPoJpO4nn7wFr8BYPQXuIHi469BOXYyjSuWJZxRTPHx3 eNagyGJCnyOkUKPvtBSHVXNACZg4o05CBhoNRxq9gh+4Ql99zjGV222YVyfVJ+9dRgoD cWuf4cdIxX9M/3BZ0fbVsS1I4pmOVkmVl8j66d12AogWNnCpJjJFiU3K1pNRYATgECZX Ll7g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wPE7oz9+/ykS8zKoedHqVltx9asTMcwNqU/NkoJcdcY=; b=DLTy7hfdBZTcsgSaySVG5jFDZs4m/tEVps0BSnZlFmEjiAvaC5hMReUBNjjn8W8uF5 4PtOa208hpZPxAf+4Sbs3fZYCZjhx/SxVyrU376ovw0nzHw0wthreifLnW5pW+KvUGag pAK7gj4Akuil1zJobrKDQmRH2sUjjF4sl08qqVxcPm23Zow/AEe4H+chrUzFzIyclkED LSmfLVRy+mDTacfJknY5UvI4v8BqVxMCkO+6fbItdBEsLHFA75f/180DFGgzaE6yLre/ MxPTaKX0jkwuk2DkS+vgxg9SDWUq8CihmSwcnX4fVVHBZ2y9lFtQwjGw+1I41lUEL0Vu 0RAg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUREw5c+0mMkQkxy9uy5fSuTYNm9Cu4nlhlmgsiWe8qdmdmvTU3 sFZ/SO7F/xYWbf+9p3S8aIpFbg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxNW8CXjnTFV/v4WjIAb7jakTDUy3oFkP7JkALz95R+UIhsGTf/3/M7lS479C8OkF5mMMCpsg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:a013:: with SMTP id j19mr6207172wme.59.1557589973884; Sat, 11 May 2019 08:52:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from boomer.baylibre.com (cag06-3-82-243-161-21.fbx.proxad.net. [82.243.161.21]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m17sm7174332wmc.6.2019.05.11.08.52.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 11 May 2019 08:52:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3bad9dc8c53e50c4aea1212bf949215660259412.camel@baylibre.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: meson: sei510: consistently order nodes From: Jerome Brunet To: Kevin Hilman Cc: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 17:52:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: <7h4l62dlyh.fsf@baylibre.com> References: <20190510155327.5759-1-jbrunet@baylibre.com> <20190510155327.5759-2-jbrunet@baylibre.com> <7h4l62dlyh.fsf@baylibre.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5 (3.30.5-1.fc29) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2019-05-10 at 14:43 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > minor nit: I kind of like "aliases" and "chosen" at the top since they > are kind of special nodes, but honestly, I can't think of a really good > reason other than personal preference, so keeping things sorted as > you've done here is probably better. > You thought the same, then thought maybe memory was important too. But going down that path, you end up sorting by feeling. It is going to be difficult to all agree on which nodes are special. In the end, we just want/need something that is easy to respect and verify. > Kevin