mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Joshua Rogers <linux@joshua.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	stable <stable@kernel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tty: vcc: zero-initialize control packet in vcc_send_ctl()
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 11:16:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3bf1002b-4e3e-4670-a3d9-2f5b7f67beb7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026073155-leverage-rentable-fbbd@gregkh>

On 31. 07. 26, 10:32, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 10:29:14AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> On 31. 07. 26, 10:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> From: Joshua Rogers <linux@joshua.hu>
>>>
>>> The stack-allocated struct vio_vcc pkt was partially initialized,
>>> leaving the tag.stype_env field uninitialized before being sent via
>>> ldc_write(), potentially leaking kernel stack data to the LDC peer.
>>>
>>> Assisted-by: AISLE:Snapshot
>>> Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Joshua Rogers <linux@joshua.hu>
>>> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/tty/vcc.c | 2 +-
>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/vcc.c b/drivers/tty/vcc.c
>>> index 27a55465bf5e..3947bd2b75ac 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/tty/vcc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/tty/vcc.c
>>> @@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ static ssize_t domain_show(struct device *dev,
>>>    static int vcc_send_ctl(struct vcc_port *port, int ctl)
>>>    {
>>> -	struct vio_vcc pkt;
>>> +	struct vio_vcc pkt = {};
>>
>> Note this needs not initialize holes.
> 
> Does it?  I keep forgetting this if it's really true or not.  I think
> we've been through this in the past but I can't find the archives.
> 
>> I believe there are none here, but memset() is usually
>> preferred/safer.
> 
> Last I remember, a long time ago, the compiler would just use memset()
> for this, and hit the holes.  Or is that a compiler-specific issue?
> 
> Yes, it's more obvious, and I'll be glad to change it, but figuring this
> out for real would be great :)

OK, so the standard (C17) does not guarantee zeroing.

What I found though:

* both clang and gcc zero the full struct for "{}". There was a bug in 
gcc < 8 where it did not.

* this is not true for designated initializer, cf. ce50039be49e ("net: 
sched: act_ife: initialize struct tc_ife to fix KMSAN kernel-infoleak")).


Adding Kees who is the author of:
====
Memory initialization
---------------------

Memory copied to userspace must always be fully initialized. If not
explicitly memset(), this will require changes to the compiler to make
sure structure holes are cleared.
====

He might aware of more bugs.



FWIW, {} here should be safe for two reasons:
* not a designated initializer
* no holes (IMO)

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-31  9:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-31  8:15 [PATCH 0/2] tty: vcc: Some small vcc bugfixes found by code scans Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-07-31  8:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] tty: vcc: zero-initialize control packet in vcc_send_ctl() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-07-31  8:29   ` Jiri Slaby
2026-07-31  8:32     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-07-31  9:16       ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
2026-07-31 12:02         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-07-31  8:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] tty: vcc: hold port lock when clearing tty pointer in vcc_cleanup Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-07-31  8:32   ` Jiri Slaby
2026-08-03 14:09     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3bf1002b-4e3e-4670-a3d9-2f5b7f67beb7@kernel.org \
    --to=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@joshua.hu \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®