Re: [PATCH] drm/panel-edp: add BOE NE160QDM-NX4 (0x0d25)

["Ingo A. Kubbilun" <ingo.kubbilun@gmail.com>]

Hi Doug,

On Fri, Nov 13, 2026 at 1:45 PM Doug Anderson wrote:
 > Please follow conventions from recent changes to this file and include
 > the EDID in the commit message.

Will do in v2. For your information, the raw EDID is:

00 ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 09 e5 25 0d 00 00 00 00
17 22 01 04 a5 22 16 78 07 ed 85 a3 54 4c 9d 26
0b 50 54 00 00 00 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01
01 01 01 01 01 01 a7 6d 00 a0 a0 40 78 60 30 20
36 00 58 d7 10 00 00 1a 00 00 00 fd 00 30 90 f8
f8 43 01 0a 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 00 00 fe 00 3d
4c 33 30 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 ff 00 00 00 fc
00 4e 45 31 36 30 51 44 4d 2d 4e 58 34 0a 01 0c

70 20 79 02 00 21 00 1d 7a 0d 66 08 00 0a 40 06
80 3d 7a 54 cc 24 9d 66 02 0b 02 35 54 40 5e 40
5e 00 44 12 78 22 00 14 99 47 0a 85 ff 09 9f 00
2f 00 1f 00 3f 06 77 00 02 00 05 00 2b 00 0c 27
00 30 8f 00 00 27 00 30 3b 00 00 2e 00 06 00 44
40 5e 40 5e 81 00 1e 72 1a 00 00 03 01 30 90 00
00 60 ff 60 ff 90 00 00 00 00 e3 05 04 00 e6 06
01 01 60 60 ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 2c 90

 > Please also provide more details about how your AI agent analyzed the
 > ACPI tables. Did it use the ACPI tables to determine the delays to use
 > here? […] or did the AI agent just look at the delays of similar panels?

The delays were not derived from the ACPI tables. I wrote this entry
myself and picked delay_200_500_e80 because other BOE NE1xx panels in
panel-edp use it; it has worked reliably across many cold boots.
I'm working with this machine on a daily basis for two weeks now without
any problems.
Only afterwards did the AI check the ACPI tables: their panel 
configuration is a generic one ("Panel_Generic_Amoled", backlight PWM 
settings only) with no power-sequencing data. There is no datasheet 
available to me.

The AI disclosure in the commit message was a generic text applied to
the whole series and overstated its role for this patch. Sorry for
that; v2 will describe it accurately.

Cheers,
Ingo