mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM: s390: selftests: Use TAP interface in the memop test
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 14:48:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3c627856-5e66-3cbe-adab-464ae573e23d@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220414105322.577439-2-thuth@redhat.com>

On 4/14/22 12:53, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The memop test currently does not have any output (unless one of the
> TEST_ASSERT statement fails), so it's hard to say for a user whether
> a certain new sub-test has been included in the binary or not. Let's
> make this a little bit more user-friendly and include some TAP output
> via the kselftests.h interface.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
> index b04c2c1b3c30..a2783d9afcac 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>  
>  #include "test_util.h"
>  #include "kvm_util.h"
> +#include "kselftest.h"
>  
>  enum mop_target {
>  	LOGICAL,
> @@ -648,33 +649,88 @@ static void test_errors(void)
>  	kvm_vm_free(t.kvm_vm);
>  }
>  
> +struct testdef {
> +	const char *name;
> +	void (*test)(void);
> +	bool needs_extension;

Please make this numeric. You could also rename it to required_extension or similar.

> +} testlist[] = {
> +	{
> +		.name = "simple copy",
> +		.test = test_copy,
> +		.needs_extension = false,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.name = "copy with storage keys",
> +		.test = test_copy_key,
> +		.needs_extension = true,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.name = "copy with key storage protection override",
> +		.test = test_copy_key_storage_prot_override,
> +		.needs_extension = true,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.name = "copy with key fetch protection",
> +		.test = test_copy_key_fetch_prot,
> +		.needs_extension = true,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.name = "copy with key fetch protection override",
> +		.test = test_copy_key_fetch_prot_override,
> +		.needs_extension = true,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.name = "error checks with key",
> +		.test = test_errors_key,
> +		.needs_extension = true,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.name = "error checks with key storage protection override",
> +		.test = test_errors_key_storage_prot_override,
> +		.needs_extension = true,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.name = "error checks without key fetch prot override",
> +		.test = test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_not_enabled,
> +		.needs_extension = true,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.name = "error checks with key fetch prot override",
> +		.test = test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_enabled,
> +		.needs_extension = true,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.name = "generic error checks",
> +		.test = test_errors,
> +		.needs_extension = false,
> +	},
> +};
> +
>  int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>  {
> -	int memop_cap, extension_cap;
> +	int memop_cap, extension_cap, idx;
>  
>  	setbuf(stdout, NULL);	/* Tell stdout not to buffer its content */
>  
> +	ksft_print_header();
> +
>  	memop_cap = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP);
>  	extension_cap = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP_EXTENSION);
>  	if (!memop_cap) {
> -		print_skip("CAP_S390_MEM_OP not supported");
> -		exit(KSFT_SKIP);
> +		ksft_exit_skip("CAP_S390_MEM_OP not supported.\n");
>  	}
>  
> -	test_copy();
> -	if (extension_cap > 0) {
> -		test_copy_key();
> -		test_copy_key_storage_prot_override();
> -		test_copy_key_fetch_prot();
> -		test_copy_key_fetch_prot_override();
> -		test_errors_key();
> -		test_errors_key_storage_prot_override();
> -		test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_not_enabled();
> -		test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_enabled();
> -	} else {
> -		print_skip("storage key memop extension not supported");
> +	ksft_set_plan(ARRAY_SIZE(testlist));
> +
> +	for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(testlist); idx++) {
> +		if (!testlist[idx].needs_extension || extension_cap) {

Then check here that extension_cap >= the required extension.
This way the test can easily be adapted in case of future extensions.
> +			testlist[idx].test();
> +			ksft_test_result_pass("%s\n", testlist[idx].name);
> +		} else {
> +			ksft_test_result_skip("%s - storage key memop not supported\n",
> +					      testlist[idx].name);
> +		}
>  	}
> -	test_errors();
>  
> -	return 0;
> +	ksft_finished();
>  }


  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-14 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-14 10:53 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: s390: selftests: Provide TAP output in tests Thomas Huth
2022-04-14 10:53 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: s390: selftests: Use TAP interface in the memop test Thomas Huth
2022-04-14 12:48   ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch [this message]
2022-04-19 17:40     ` Thomas Huth
2022-04-20 10:55       ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-04-14 10:53 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: s390: selftests: Use TAP interface in the sync_regs test Thomas Huth
2022-04-14 11:39   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-04-14 12:02     ` Thomas Huth
2022-04-14 10:53 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: s390: selftests: Use TAP interface in the tprot test Thomas Huth
2022-04-14 11:51   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-04-14 12:08     ` Thomas Huth
2022-04-14 12:33       ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-04-19 17:45         ` Thomas Huth
2022-04-14 10:53 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: s390: selftests: Use TAP interface in the reset test Thomas Huth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3c627856-5e66-3cbe-adab-464ae573e23d@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=scgl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome