From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from rtits2.realtek.com.tw (rtits2.realtek.com [211.75.126.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E345863A9; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 01:43:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=211.75.126.72 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713318188; cv=none; b=U6xQli4V3ulIsrWO7Hyk78P5fqXPlXAx1LuY4lXQXI8f2p19Tvfg/HlTJCLkzkmJ7HmB5pmp3YPdkbjEwfMymmMoIdSJfWgr/XbGSEZ8pjmFZfYYqrq4oiRrMMnC9edZ/B+qlE24KNRkAu4UgfSB/cAnCrJs6hxjgjJlyb9SvXM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713318188; c=relaxed/simple; bh=E299Tf6plxJS+Bo+S9eKwsp6tZxR9yPGTVMOumjJlSA=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=deOlRw4WalJ+MRYORmgq9IquWxvntadQXVnOL/HnpvYO0VHPpuD+UlJq2PXUJcuDNhi1fSW0j8mIrvLBE6mzsHe4HiQ4xP/xxrDRs5tTbAA0zCC7e7CXkoWKAlH1bvH3XYW1x56V7feQ1D7AiL71sdwZwN8Rc6g34PX9ovGGDlQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=realtek.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=realtek.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=211.75.126.72 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=realtek.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=realtek.com X-SpamFilter-By: ArmorX SpamTrap 5.78 with qID 43H1gwUB32821260, This message is accepted by code: ctloc85258 Received: from mail.realtek.com (rtexh36506.realtek.com.tw[172.21.6.27]) by rtits2.realtek.com.tw (8.15.2/2.95/5.92) with ESMTPS id 43H1gwUB32821260 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:42:58 +0800 Received: from RTEXMBS05.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.98) by RTEXH36506.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:42:58 +0800 Received: from RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) by RTEXMBS05.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:42:57 +0800 Received: from RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw ([fe80::1a1:9ae3:e313:52e7]) by RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw ([fe80::1a1:9ae3:e313:52e7%5]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.035; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:42:57 +0800 From: Ping-Ke Shih To: Lewis Robbins , "kvalo@kernel.org" CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH] wifi: rtw88: reduce failed to flush queue severity Thread-Topic: [PATCH] wifi: rtw88: reduce failed to flush queue severity Thread-Index: AQHajfcTVqg9i2byzkGmq7L8YOsC/LFojyVQgAD1gD3///KZAIAAvNSwgAGAkvA= Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 01:42:56 +0000 Message-ID: <3c6c78248b4144509d733d610991e921@realtek.com> References: <87le5ey52e.fsf@kernel.org> <20240415232837.388945-2-lewis.robbins2@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US, zh-TW Content-Language: zh-TW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 >=20 > The cause is because packets in hardware TX queue that can't be sent out = in time, > and flush ops with 'drop =3D false', so driver throws one warning. I don'= t have > good idea for now. Maybe, we can add a special debug mask to replace this= kind of > verbose warning with uncertain solution. I have made a patch [1] as mentioned before. Lewis, please give it a try. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20240417014036.11234-1-pkshih@re= altek.com/T/#u