From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Jann Horn' <jannh@google.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@intel.com>,
Mukesh Ojha <mojha@codeaurora.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 2/4] x86/microcode: Fix __user annotations around generic_load_microcode()
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 09:55:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3c9697611e214d089f7a04086635c5a8@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG48ez04ARfFNXHUsod1kCH08k=-EvTbQkgLoLMfegNfyj-0zg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jann Horn
> Sent: 01 April 2019 18:54
...
> > This ->get_ucode_data() BIOS-code-like contraption has always bugged me
> > for being too ugly to live.
> >
> > How about we vmalloc() a properly sized buffer - both
> > generic_load_microcode() callers have the size - and then hand that
> > buffer into generic_load_microcode() ?
> >
> > That solves the __user annotation fun immediately and would simplify
> > generic_load_microcode() additionally.
> >
> > The disadvantage would be having to vmalloc() a couple of... , I think
> > it is megabytes, with that old loading method request_microcode_user()
> > but then if vmalloc() fails, then it was clearly too big. I don't think
> > the blob can ever be that big though, to fail vmalloc(), but I'm not
> > going to bet on it...
>
> Hm. request_microcode_fw() gets that buffer from
> request_firmware_direct(), which does this:
>
> __module_get(THIS_MODULE);
> ret = _request_firmware(firmware_p, name, device, NULL, 0,
> FW_OPT_UEVENT | FW_OPT_NO_WARN |
> FW_OPT_NOFALLBACK);
> module_put(THIS_MODULE);
> return ret;
>
> What is that module_get()/module_put() supposed to be good for? Are we
> expecting that caller to do something ridiculous like calling
> module_put() on us? This doesn't seem to make any sense.
At least it isn't doing a try_module_get(THIS_MODULE) :-)
> And then _request_firmware() goes and ends up in places like
> kernel_read_file(), which already use vmalloc().
>
>
> Anyway, isn't this kind of thing exactly why we have that iov_iter
> stuff? request_microcode_fw() can build an ITER_KVEC,
> request_microcode_user() can build an ITER_IOVEC. And then
> generic_load_microcode() can use something like copy_from_iter(). Does
> that sound reasonable?
That ought to allow the microcode be copied in chunks - removing the
need for a massive buffer?
The largest file we ever copy to PCIe cards is a 6MB fpga image.
But we do that by mmapping the PCIe registers directly into userspace.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-02 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-29 21:46 [PATCH v3 1/4] kernel.h: use parentheses around argument in u64_to_user_ptr() Jann Horn
2019-03-29 21:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] x86/microcode: Fix __user annotations around generic_load_microcode() Jann Horn
2019-04-01 17:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-01 17:53 ` Jann Horn
2019-04-02 9:55 ` David Laight [this message]
2019-04-02 10:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-02 10:26 ` David Laight
2019-03-29 21:46 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/fpu: Fix __user annotations Jann Horn
2019-04-03 12:43 ` [tip:x86/fpu] " tip-bot for Jann Horn
2019-03-29 21:46 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] x86/uaccess: Fix implicit cast of __user pointer Jann Horn
2019-04-03 15:10 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Jann Horn
2019-04-03 11:10 ` [tip:core/urgent] linux/kernel.h: Use parentheses around argument in u64_to_user_ptr() tip-bot for Jann Horn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3c9697611e214d089f7a04086635c5a8@AcuMS.aculab.com \
--to=david.laight@aculab.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mojha@codeaurora.org \
--cc=qiaowei.ren@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®