Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/microcode/AMD: Make __verify_patch_size() return bool

[Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>]

On 14.11.24 г. 16:26 ч., Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 04:13:33PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>>           if (sh_psize != max_size)
>>>                   return false;
>>
>> Isn't sh_psize < max_size valid here?
> 
> * sh_psize < min_t(u32, buf_size, max_size) == max_size -- ditto.
> 
> This is still some sort of a mismatch which we'd rather fail.
> 
> That max_size should probably be called patch_size or so.
> 
> IOW, if the patch size in the header doesn't match the per-family patch size
> => fail.

Right, the important bit here is that max_size is not really max_size 
but, as you say, patch_size so for those families it's expected to have 
an exact size.

With max_size I perceive it would imply that the current patch can be 
_at most_ max_size, but might as well be smaller.



>