From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
Emil Tsalapatis <etsal@meta.com>,
Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/sched_ext: Add lazy preemption tests
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 11:03:36 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3cd8e126a2f214673abfa78fc303b1b1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260915194611.2674127-3-arighi@nvidia.com>
Hello, Andrea.
This is an AI review. The tests pass here under vng in lazy, full and none
modes. The timing below was measured with the target CPU on nohz_full.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2026 at 09:45:13PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> +void BPF_STRUCT_OPS(kick_stopping, struct task_struct *p, bool runnable)
> +{
> + if (p->pid == victim_pid && state == KICK_STATE_RESCHED)
> + state = KICK_STATE_DONE;
> +}
In the kick and tick scenarios the victim is the only runnable task on the
target CPU, so when its slice is cleared the kernel keeps running it with a
refilled slice and ops.stopping() is never called. DONE only arrives when some
other task pinned to that CPU wakes up. With the target CPU on nohz_full here,
the first such wakeup was a kworker 2.86s after the victim started, against
the 3s wait. Without nohz_full the scenarios still spend about half a second
each waiting for one. SCX_OPS_ENQ_LAST with the SCX_ENQ_LAST kick as in
nohz_tick.bpf.c would put the victim through ops.stopping() on its own.
> +SEC("fexit/__resched_curr")
> +int BPF_PROG(kick_need_resched, struct rq *rq, int tif)
> +{
> + struct task_struct *task = BPF_CORE_READ(rq, curr);
> +
> + if (!task || BPF_CORE_READ(task, pid) != victim_pid ||
> + BPF_CORE_READ(rq, cpu) != target_cpu || state != KICK_STATE_QUEUED)
> + return 0;
This latches the first resched of the victim whatever the cause. A higher
class wakeup on the target CPU inside the window, which is the whole 20ms
slice in TICK_EXPIRY, records a full slice and fails observation_valid().
Skipping observations with a non-zero slice would be more robust.
> + SCX_EQ(lazy_wait.resched_tif, immediate.resched_tif);
> + SCX_GT(lazy_wait.nr_wait_callbacks, 0);
DONE is set from ops.stopping() before the context switch and the balance
callback runs after it, so this read can race the increment. Poll for it.
> + file = fopen("/sys/kernel/debug/sched/preempt", "r");
> + if (!file) {
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_LAZY) && !defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC)
> + return 1;
> +#else
> + return -1;
> +#endif
This reflects the build tree, not the running kernel. Also, none and voluntary
return -1 and skip the comparison, but the TIFs must match in those modes too.
> + skel->rodata->scenario = scenario;
> + if (kick__load(skel))
> + goto out;
If __resched_curr() isn't in BTF, this fails too and kick_invalid FAILs along
with the other four although it doesn't use the tracer. Skipping when the
target is missing would be better.
> + if (!start_gated_worker(&victim) ||
> + !wait_for_counter(&skel->bss->nr_lazy_victim_running, 1,
> + PHASE_TIMEOUT_MS)) {
> + SCX_ERR("Lazy-enqueue victim was not scheduled");
> + goto out;
> + }
> + usleep(100000);
Neither lazy phase checks that the tick actually stopped before the request,
so they pass with the tick running the whole time.
> Extend the NO_HZ_FULL test with infinite-slice victims. Verify that lazy
> enqueue and kick requests restart a stopped tick and make forward
> progress. Keep invalid kick flag coverage and skip modes not exposed by
> the running kernel.
kick.c is new, nothing is kept. The controller mask and timeout changes to
nohz_tick aren't mentioned either.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-15 19:45 [PATCHSET v5 sched_ext/for-7.4] sched_ext: Add lazy preemption support Andrea Righi
2026-09-15 19:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Andrea Righi
2026-09-16 21:03 ` Tejun Heo
2026-09-15 19:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/sched_ext: Add lazy preemption tests Andrea Righi
2026-09-16 21:03 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-09-17 7:02 [PATCHSET v6 sched_ext/for-7.4] sched_ext: Add lazy preemption support Andrea Righi
2026-09-17 7:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/sched_ext: Add lazy preemption tests Andrea Righi
2026-09-17 19:19 ` Tejun Heo
2026-09-15 9:00 [PATCHSET v4 sched_ext/for-7.4] sched_ext: Add lazy preemption support Andrea Righi
2026-09-15 9:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/sched_ext: Add lazy preemption tests Andrea Righi
2026-09-14 14:44 [PATCHSET v3 sched_ext/for-7.4] sched_ext: Add lazy preemption support Andrea Righi
2026-09-14 14:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/sched_ext: Add lazy preemption tests Andrea Righi
2026-09-14 8:47 [PATCHSET v2 sched_ext/for-7.4] sched_ext: Add lazy preemption support Andrea Righi
2026-09-14 8:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/sched_ext: Add lazy preemption tests Andrea Righi
2026-09-14 14:55 ` Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-09-15 13:35 ` Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3cd8e126a2f214673abfa78fc303b1b1@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=etsal@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=yphbchou0911@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®