mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] locking/lockdep: Add kasan_check_byte() check in lock_acquire()
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 09:09:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d069c26-4971-415a-9751-a28d207feb43@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANpmjNM-uN81Aje1GE9zgUW-Q=w_2gPQ28giO7N2nmbRM521kA@mail.gmail.com>

On 2/14/25 5:44 AM, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 21:02, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> wrote:
>> KASAN instrumentation of lockdep has been disabled as we don't need
>> KASAN to check the validity of lockdep internal data structures and
>> incur unnecessary performance overhead. However, the lockdep_map pointer
>> passed in externally may not be valid (e.g. use-after-free) and we run
>> the risk of using garbage data resulting in false lockdep reports. Add
>> kasan_check_byte() call in lock_acquire() for non kernel core data
>> object to catch invalid lockdep_map and abort lockdep processing if
>> input data isn't valid.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
>
> but double-check if the below can be simplified.
>
>> ---
>>   kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h |  1 +
>>   kernel/locking/lockdep.c          | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h b/kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h
>> index 9ef9850aeebe..bed59b2195c7 100644
>> --- a/kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h
>> +++ b/kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h
>> @@ -95,3 +95,4 @@ LOCK_EVENT(rtmutex_deadlock)  /* # of rt_mutex_handle_deadlock()'s    */
>>   LOCK_EVENT(lockdep_acquire)
>>   LOCK_EVENT(lockdep_lock)
>>   LOCK_EVENT(lockdep_nocheck)
>> +LOCK_EVENT(lockdep_kasan_fail)
>> diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
>> index 8436f017c74d..98dd0455d4be 100644
>> --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
>> +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
>> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/lockdep.h>
>>   #include <linux/context_tracking.h>
>>   #include <linux/console.h>
>> +#include <linux/kasan.h>
>>
>>   #include <asm/sections.h>
>>
>> @@ -5830,6 +5831,19 @@ void lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
>>          if (!debug_locks)
>>                  return;
>>
>> +       /*
>> +        * As KASAN instrumentation is disabled and lock_acquire() is usually
>> +        * the first lockdep call when a task tries to acquire a lock, add
>> +        * kasan_check_byte() here to check for use-after-free of non kernel
>> +        * core lockdep_map data to avoid referencing garbage data.
>> +        */
>> +       if (unlikely(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN) &&
> This is not needed - kasan_check_byte() will always return true if
> KASAN is disabled or not compiled in.
I added this check because of the is_kernel_core_data() call.
>
>> +                    !is_kernel_core_data((unsigned long)lock) &&
> Why use !is_kernel_core_data()? Is it to improve performance?

Not exactly. In my testing, just using kasan_check_byte() doesn't quite 
work out. It seems to return false positive in some cases causing 
lockdep splat. I didn't look into exactly why this happens and I added 
the is_kernel_core_data() call to work around that.

Cheers,
Longman


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-14 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-13 20:02 [PATCH v4 0/4] locking/lockdep: Disable KASAN instrumentation of lockdep.c Waiman Long
2025-02-13 20:02 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] locking/lock_events: Add locking events for rtmutex slow paths Waiman Long
2025-03-03 18:51   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Waiman Long
2025-02-13 20:02 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] locking/lock_events: Add locking events for lockdep Waiman Long
2025-03-03 18:51   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Waiman Long
2025-02-13 20:02 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] locking/lockdep: Disable KASAN instrumentation of lockdep.c Waiman Long
2025-02-17  7:00   ` Marco Elver
2025-02-17 16:53   ` Andrey Konovalov
2025-03-03 18:51   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Waiman Long
2025-02-13 20:02 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] locking/lockdep: Add kasan_check_byte() check in lock_acquire() Waiman Long
2025-02-14 10:44   ` Marco Elver
2025-02-14 14:09     ` Waiman Long [this message]
2025-02-14 14:44       ` Marco Elver
2025-02-14 15:30         ` Waiman Long
2025-02-14 16:18         ` Waiman Long
2025-02-14 16:43           ` Marco Elver
2025-02-14 17:18             ` Waiman Long
2025-02-14 19:52 ` [PATCH v4.1 " Waiman Long
2025-02-17  7:00   ` Marco Elver
2025-02-17 16:51   ` Andrey Konovalov
2025-03-03 18:51   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Waiman Long
2025-02-24  2:11 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] locking/lockdep: Disable KASAN instrumentation of lockdep.c Boqun Feng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3d069c26-4971-415a-9751-a28d207feb43@redhat.com \
    --to=llong@redhat.com \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®