From: Alexey Makhalov <alexey.makhalov@broadcom.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
hpa@zytor.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, mingo@redhat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
richardcochran@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, zackr@vmware.com,
linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com, pv-drivers@vmware.com,
timothym@vmware.com, akaher@vmware.com,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, daniel@ffwll.ch,
airlied@gmail.com, tzimmermann@suse.de, mripard@kernel.org,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, horms@kernel.org,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/8] x86/vmware: Introduce VMware hypercall API
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 16:18:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d6ec46c-53c2-4a13-90ff-eb419863c1d5@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240603175844.GKZl4EVGUxp2aQZnYJ@fat_crate.local>
On 6/3/24 10:58 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 05:44:32PM -0700, Alexey Makhalov wrote:
>> While most of the vmware_hypercall callers are executed after alternative
>> patching applied, there are small amount of hypercalls running before that.
>> Only for them we have the logic of analyzing vmware_hypercall_mode as a
>> default alternative code. And there are 2 constraints:
>> 1. vmcall/vmmcall are not supported by old ESXi/Workstation/Fusion. We have
>> to use in/out instructions. After the end of support of old hypervisors the
>> alternative can be simplified as follow:
>> ALTERNATIVE("vmcall", "vmmcall", X86_FEATURE_VMW_VMMCALL);
>> 2. SEV-ES enabled VMs should use _only_ vmcall/vmmcall as in/out
>> instructions cause faults.
>>
>> Another approach that we discussed internally was to use
>> ALTERNATIVE_2("movw %[port], %%dx; "inl (%%dx), %%eax", "vmcall",
>> X86_FEATURE_VMW_VMCALL, "vmmcall", X86_FEATURE_VMW_VMMCALL) for
>> vmware_hypercallX family of functions, _and_ to have a separate API
>> vmware_sev_hypercallX, with the silly dance without an alternative inside,
>> to be used only by early boot code, before alternative application. But,
>> it's error prone when things come to boot time related code movements or
>> rearrangements as it puts additional requirement for SEV-ES
>> understanding/testing for VMware guests.
>
> Right, so since we're exporting that alternatives_patched thing already,
> you might also try to do:
>
> if (unlikely(!alternatives_patched))
> return slow_hypercall_X_in_c();
>
> asm_inline volatile(VMWARE_HYPERCALL...
>
> where that slow_hypercall_X_in_c()* set of APIs does the checks in C.
>
> And the VMWARE_HYPERCALL thing is a lot simpler then.
>
> All in all, you'll have a lot less unreadable asm to pay attention to
> and those APIs should be all easy and readable.
>
Thanks for the idea.
I improved the condition to eliminate slow path for modules such as
vmmouse, vmwgfx.
if (unlikely(!alternatives_patched) && !__is_defined(MODULE))
return vmware_hypercall_slow(...);
It also drops the need for exporting vmware_hypercall_mode or
vmware_hypercall_slow symbols.
Will post just Patch0001 for review here before sending v11 out.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-06 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-23 19:14 [PATCH v10 0/8] VMware hypercalls enhancements Alexey Makhalov
2024-05-23 19:14 ` [PATCH v10 1/8] x86/vmware: Introduce VMware hypercall API Alexey Makhalov
2024-05-27 17:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-05-30 0:44 ` Alexey Makhalov
2024-06-03 17:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-06-06 23:18 ` Alexey Makhalov [this message]
2024-06-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v11 " Alexey Makhalov
2024-06-12 22:11 ` Alexey Makhalov
2024-06-13 8:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-05-23 19:14 ` [PATCH v10 2/8] ptp/vmware: Use " Alexey Makhalov
2024-05-23 19:14 ` [PATCH v10 3/8] input/vmmouse: " Alexey Makhalov
2024-05-23 19:14 ` [PATCH v10 4/8] drm/vmwgfx: " Alexey Makhalov
2024-05-23 19:14 ` [PATCH v10 5/8] x86/vmware: " Alexey Makhalov
2024-05-23 19:14 ` [PATCH v10 6/8] x86/vmware: Correct macro names Alexey Makhalov
2024-05-25 15:53 ` Markus Elfring
2024-05-30 0:45 ` Alexey Makhalov
2024-05-23 19:14 ` [PATCH v10 7/8] x86/vmware: Remove legacy VMWARE_HYPERCALL* macros Alexey Makhalov
2024-05-23 19:14 ` [PATCH v10 8/8] x86/vmware: Add TDX hypercall support Alexey Makhalov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d6ec46c-53c2-4a13-90ff-eb419863c1d5@broadcom.com \
--to=alexey.makhalov@broadcom.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=akaher@vmware.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pv-drivers@vmware.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=timothym@vmware.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zackr@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®