mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>
To: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org, somlo@cmu.edu,
	mst@redhat.com, jaegeuk@kernel.org, chao@kernel.org,
	hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com, huangjianan@oppo.com,
	mark@fasheh.com, jlbec@evilplan.org, joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, alexander.deucher@amd.com,
	richard@nod.at, liushixin2@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kset: fix memory leak when kset_register() returns error
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 12:51:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d7ced9c-b87b-cf4b-4d67-5d497f0f1066@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221025071549.1280528-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com>

On 2022-10-25 03:15, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> Inject fault while loading module, kset_register() may fail.
> If it fails, the kset.kobj.name allocated by kobject_set_name()
> which must be called before a call to kset_register() may be
> leaked, since refcount of kobj was set in kset_init().

Technically, this is saying "If it fails, the kset.kobj.name may be leaked."
We want then to clarify that this is "allocated by kobj_set_name() which
must be called before a call to kset_register", so that needs to
be surrounded by commas (like a literary segue):

"If kset_register() fails, the kset.kobj.name allocated by kobject_set_name(),
 which must be called before a call to kset_register(), may be
 leaked."

I don't feel that the reason for the leak is "refcount of kobj was set in kset_init()".
It's a true statement, but not the reason for the leak--the reason for the leak is that
no one frees it on the error path.
 
> To mitigate this, we free the name in kset_register() when an
> error is encountered, i.e. when kset_register() returns an error.
> 
> A kset may be embedded in a larger structure which may be dynamically
> allocated in callers, it needs to be freed in ktype.release() or error

"_by_ callers", since it's something they _do_: allocate.

> path in callers, in this case, we can not call kset_put() in kset_register(),
> or it will cause double free, so just call kfree_const() to free the
> name and set it to NULL to avoid accessing bad pointer in callers.

That's good.

> With this fix, the callers don't need care about freeing the name
> and may call kset_put() if kset_register() fails.

"don't need to care about freeing the name" --> "don't need to free the name"

> Suggested-by: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
> ---
> v2 -> v3:
>   Update commit message and comment of kset_register().
> 
> v1 -> v2:
>   Free name inside of kset_register() instead of calling kset_put()
>   in drivers.
> ---
>  lib/kobject.c | 9 ++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/kobject.c b/lib/kobject.c
> index a0b2dbfcfa23..3cd19b9ca5ab 100644
> --- a/lib/kobject.c
> +++ b/lib/kobject.c
> @@ -834,6 +834,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kobj_sysfs_ops);
>  /**
>   * kset_register() - Initialize and add a kset.
>   * @k: kset.
> + *
> + * NOTE: On error, the kset.kobj.name allocated by() kobj_set_name()
> + * is freed, it can not be used any more.

There's no need for "NOTE:"--it's just natural explanation of
what's happening, and what's expected in the doc comment to a function.
Drop it.

"is freed" is correct--that's a good change.

With these fixed, this patch is
Reviewed-by: <luben.tuikov@amd.com>

Regards,
Luben

>   */
>  int kset_register(struct kset *k)
>  {
> @@ -844,8 +847,12 @@ int kset_register(struct kset *k)
>  
>  	kset_init(k);
>  	err = kobject_add_internal(&k->kobj);
> -	if (err)
> +	if (err) {
> +		kfree_const(k->kobj.name);
> +		/* Set it to NULL to avoid accessing bad pointer in callers. */
> +		k->kobj.name = NULL;
>  		return err;
> +	}
>  	kobject_uevent(&k->kobj, KOBJ_ADD);
>  	return 0;
>  }


  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-25 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-25  7:15 Yang Yingliang
2022-10-25 16:51 ` Luben Tuikov [this message]
2022-10-25 16:57 ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3d7ced9c-b87b-cf4b-4d67-5d497f0f1066@amd.com \
    --to=luben.tuikov@amd.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=huangjianan@oppo.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=liushixin2@huawei.com \
    --cc=mark@fasheh.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=somlo@cmu.edu \
    --cc=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®