From: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org
To: chenyy23@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn,bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: chenyy23@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn,ast@kernel.org,daniel@iogearbox.net,andrii@kernel.org,eddyz87@gmail.com,memxor@gmail.com,martin.lau@linux.dev,song@kernel.org,yonghong.song@linux.dev,jolsa@kernel.org,emil@etsalapatis.com,john.fastabend@gmail.com,shuah@kernel.org,linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,ast@kernel.org,andrii@kernel.org,daniel@iogearbox.net,martin.lau@kernel.org,eddyz87@gmail.com,yonghong.song@linux.dev,clm@meta.com,ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add skb dynptr writer packet invalidation tests
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 16:26:42 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d8e0694c62b87eec4aee4f35e6b91636b2c2f4c8bbc1790f612446d0d58a3e8@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5a2ca20101d9446d3a92815a8a3cc27b84db1754.1781535194.git.chenyy23@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6040 bytes --]
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_fail.c
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_fail.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_fail.c
> @@ -1232,6 +1232,189 @@ int skb_invalid_data_slice4(struct __sk_buff *skb)
> return SK_PASS;
> }
>
> +char dynptr_writer_data[8] = "test";
> +char dynptr_writer_dst[8];
> +
> +extern int bpf_dynptr_copy(struct bpf_dynptr *dst, __u64 dst_off,
> + struct bpf_dynptr *src, __u64 src_off,
> + __u64 size) __ksym __weak;
> +extern int bpf_dynptr_memset(struct bpf_dynptr *ptr, __u64 offset,
> + __u64 size, __u8 val) __ksym __weak;
> +extern int bpf_probe_read_kernel_dynptr(struct bpf_dynptr *dptr,
> + __u64 off, __u64 size,
> + const void *unsafe_ptr__ign) __ksym __weak;
> +
> +__noinline int global_dynptr_helper_write(struct bpf_dynptr *ptr)
> +{
> + return bpf_dynptr_write(ptr, 0, dynptr_writer_data, 1, 0);
> +}
> +
> +__noinline int global_dynptr_helper_write_and_read(struct __sk_buff *skb,
> + struct bpf_dynptr *ptr)
> +{
> + __u8 *data = (void *)(long)skb->data;
> + __u8 *data_end = (void *)(long)skb->data_end;
> +
> + if (data + 1 > data_end)
> + return SK_DROP;
> +
> + bpf_dynptr_write(ptr, 0, dynptr_writer_data, 1, 0);
> +
> + /* this should fail */
> + return *data;
> +}
> +
> +__noinline int global_dynptr_kfunc_memset(struct bpf_dynptr *ptr)
> +{
> + return bpf_dynptr_memset(ptr, 0, 1, 0);
> +}
> +
> +__noinline int global_dynptr_kfunc_memset_and_read(struct __sk_buff *skb,
> + struct bpf_dynptr *ptr)
> +{
> + __u8 *data = (void *)(long)skb->data;
> + __u8 *data_end = (void *)(long)skb->data_end;
> +
> + if (data + 1 > data_end)
> + return SK_DROP;
> +
> + bpf_dynptr_memset(ptr, 0, 1, 0);
> +
> + /* this should fail */
> + return *data;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("?tc")
> +__failure __msg("invalid mem access 'scalar'")
> +int skb_pkt_ptr_invalid_after_global_dynptr_write(struct __sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + __u8 *data = (void *)(long)skb->data;
> + __u8 *data_end = (void *)(long)skb->data_end;
> + struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
> +
> + if (data + 1 > data_end)
> + return SK_DROP;
> +
> + bpf_dynptr_from_skb(skb, 0, &ptr);
> + global_dynptr_helper_write(&ptr);
> +
> + /* this should fail */
> + return *data;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("?tc")
> +__failure __msg("invalid mem access 'scalar'")
> +int skb_pkt_ptr_invalid_inside_global_dynptr_write(struct __sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
> +
> + bpf_dynptr_from_skb(skb, 0, &ptr);
> +
> + return global_dynptr_helper_write_and_read(skb, &ptr);
> +}
> +
> +SEC("?tc")
> +__failure __msg("invalid mem access 'scalar'")
> +int skb_pkt_ptr_invalid_after_dynptr_memset(struct __sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + __u8 *data = (void *)(long)skb->data;
> + __u8 *data_end = (void *)(long)skb->data_end;
> + struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
> +
> + if (data + 1 > data_end)
> + return SK_DROP;
> +
> + bpf_dynptr_from_skb(skb, 0, &ptr);
> + bpf_dynptr_memset(&ptr, 0, 1, 0);
> +
> + /* this should fail */
> + return *data;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("?tc")
> +__failure __msg("invalid mem access 'scalar'")
> +int skb_pkt_ptr_invalid_after_global_dynptr_memset(struct __sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + __u8 *data = (void *)(long)skb->data;
> + __u8 *data_end = (void *)(long)skb->data_end;
> + struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
> +
> + if (data + 1 > data_end)
> + return SK_DROP;
> +
> + bpf_dynptr_from_skb(skb, 0, &ptr);
> + global_dynptr_kfunc_memset(&ptr);
> +
> + /* this should fail */
> + return *data;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("?tc")
> +__failure __msg("invalid mem access 'scalar'")
> +int skb_pkt_ptr_invalid_inside_global_dynptr_memset(struct __sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
> +
> + bpf_dynptr_from_skb(skb, 0, &ptr);
> +
> + return global_dynptr_kfunc_memset_and_read(skb, &ptr);
> +}
> +
> +SEC("?tc")
> +__failure __msg("invalid mem access 'scalar'")
> +int skb_pkt_ptr_invalid_after_dynptr_copy_dst(struct __sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + __u8 *data = (void *)(long)skb->data;
> + __u8 *data_end = (void *)(long)skb->data_end;
> + struct bpf_dynptr dst, src;
> +
> + if (data + 1 > data_end)
> + return SK_DROP;
> +
> + bpf_dynptr_from_skb(skb, 0, &dst);
> + bpf_dynptr_from_mem(dynptr_writer_data, sizeof(dynptr_writer_data), 0, &src);
> + bpf_dynptr_copy(&dst, 0, &src, 0, 1);
> +
> + /* this should fail */
> + return *data;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("?tc")
> +__success
> +int skb_pkt_ptr_valid_after_dynptr_copy_src(struct __sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + __u8 *data = (void *)(long)skb->data;
> + __u8 *data_end = (void *)(long)skb->data_end;
> + struct bpf_dynptr dst, src;
> +
> + if (data + 1 > data_end)
> + return SK_DROP;
> +
> + bpf_dynptr_from_skb(skb, 0, &src);
> + bpf_dynptr_from_mem(dynptr_writer_dst, sizeof(dynptr_writer_dst), 0, &dst);
> + bpf_dynptr_copy(&dst, 0, &src, 0, 1);
> +
> + return *data;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("?tc")
> +__failure __msg("invalid mem access 'scalar'")
> +int skb_pkt_ptr_invalid_after_probe_read_kernel_dynptr(struct __sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + __u8 *data = (void *)(long)skb->data;
> + __u8 *data_end = (void *)(long)skb->data_end;
> + struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
> +
> + if (data + 1 > data_end)
> + return SK_DROP;
> +
> + bpf_dynptr_from_skb(skb, 0, &ptr);
> + bpf_probe_read_kernel_dynptr(&ptr, 0, 1, dynptr_writer_data);
> +
> + /* this should fail */
> + return *data;
> +}
This patch series was NACKed by Alexei Starovoitov in v3 with the comment
"nack. pw-bot: cr" (change requested). The companion verifier fix patch
(patch 1/2 in the series) was rejected, which blocks this selftest patch
from landing. A v4 was posted to address the helper-side bpf_dynptr_write()
case, but has not yet received maintainer feedback.
Are there plans to address the maintainer feedback and resubmit the series?
Reference: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/DJ9QS5OUJTSG.1DSRYHG6GAG3H@gmail.com/
---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/27557183694
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-15 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-15 12:28 [PATCH bpf v2 0/2] bpf: Fix packet pointer invalidation for skb dynptr writes Yiyang Chen
2026-06-15 12:28 ` [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] " Yiyang Chen
2026-06-15 12:28 ` [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add skb dynptr writer packet invalidation tests Yiyang Chen
2026-06-15 14:14 ` [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: Fix packet pointer invalidation for skb dynptr writes Yiyang Chen
2026-06-15 14:14 ` [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] " Yiyang Chen
2026-06-15 15:52 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-06-15 16:46 ` Yiyang Chen
2026-06-15 17:30 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-06-15 17:59 ` Yiyang Chen
2026-06-15 14:14 ` [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add skb dynptr writer packet invalidation tests Yiyang Chen
2026-06-15 15:15 ` [PATCH bpf v4 0/2] bpf: Fix packet pointer invalidation for skb dynptr writes Yiyang Chen
2026-06-15 15:15 ` [PATCH bpf v4 1/2] " Yiyang Chen
2026-06-15 15:15 ` [PATCH bpf v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add skb dynptr writer packet invalidation tests Yiyang Chen
2026-06-15 16:26 ` bot+bpf-ci [this message]
2026-06-15 17:49 ` [PATCH bpf v5 0/2] bpf: Fix packet pointer invalidation for skb dynptr writes Yiyang Chen
2026-06-15 17:49 ` [PATCH bpf v5 1/2] " Yiyang Chen
2026-06-15 17:52 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-06-15 17:49 ` [PATCH bpf v5 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add skb dynptr writer packet invalidation tests Yiyang Chen
2026-06-15 18:39 ` bot+bpf-ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d8e0694c62b87eec4aee4f35e6b91636b2c2f4c8bbc1790f612446d0d58a3e8@mail.kernel.org \
--to=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenyy23@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®