From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 008.lax.mailroute.net (008.lax.mailroute.net [199.89.1.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B484216F0C2 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:53:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719863638; cv=none; b=qrbWMa6WSpBoS+vGpKLPjxA+AbMI5wJh4M4n/VXb7upZ606orTCITJeh2OclwbKuhacaNTKT8MfiOyQCm+JDUb0NPOEdaG/PsPRgc7PVxTfeTmjLJZt+myTCttKjs+ipbtnWa6dVfOkjDa96O+EuxezV3PduXsSQbZf/EEocKbY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719863638; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wq9bhqS3zCbu9gJD3O0EoBVvdzJE9spKvwDbUBPvqwE=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:From:Subject:To:Cc:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=ZZEmgGTEWuRgdp5jdg6EMgv2vckwuYreWXIcspLXCkNZbZoyRUckJKKkhpZPMHv2K3DWC+TgqHAdPe4D6lNhyZcX4DZ+Z5q/3rxOw78IID4PqzSwYkOJC8UzZsUJa77DG5ilJl2BTiTyf2vWTAtfR4Kbre2etcZlDwpZVsa2fKQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=p8L1csTW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="p8L1csTW" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 008.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WCcDh0CSvz6Cp2tZ; Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:53:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :content-language:references:subject:subject:from:from :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1719863632; x=1722455633; bh=2RedW0+tdVWSl88RavhXHAEH rSw/trVcgxslWfPVWLM=; b=p8L1csTWtBqrC01fYg07g1F1oZmCFAE7fdieicTj gFNT8j6pj7Lu4nOWBXL0JC/KZ+JYTOSrN9Xot4kZAreFxwUaxEMJVNS+0tSMCFdM drYhkm1wMITXO1xFfih3gzq5u7Y1qcgvQyAoXGTcvcbTb9i7M1qoC9W2hB+JR704 MGlnpSyKcEeeATEJ00bZkZldEIa9/f7VXvIXMqaPTOB8AD3KZnrspPUe+ttHg9Rj PqKpxK9ivsWMTq4bKIkjnLbqerb8nmLLMEGgH10F5nLliGD6PezGYX0QhZuktYID 8n1M6WNgvePPVkYN4kAicYEEVrRSBW2lqSZBe76BlIFFJw== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 008.lax.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (008.lax [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id EBgrLXBx4vtf; Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:53:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.3.219] (c-73-231-117-72.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.117.72]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 008.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4WCcDY3FQQz6Cnk90; Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:53:49 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <3d8f288a-bfe8-4d25-967c-1be688bc1667@acm.org> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 12:53:47 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird From: Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/53] pds_core: Simplify a create*_workqueue() call To: Brett Creeley , Tejun Heo Cc: Lai Jiangshan , "Martin K . Petersen" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shannon Nelson , Brett Creeley , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni References: <20240630222904.627462-1-bvanassche@acm.org> <20240630222904.627462-24-bvanassche@acm.org> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 7/1/24 11:49 AM, Brett Creeley wrote: > LGTM. Thanks. > > Reviewed-by: Brett Creeley > > BTW, I don't actually see patch 53/53 that renames *workqueue2() -> > *workqueue(). Am I missing something here? It's mentioned in the > cover letter, but I don't see it on the series thread. Hi Brett, I don't see patch 53/53 either on Lore. Maybe I hit an outgoing mail limit when I sent out this patch series. Note: as one can see from Tejun's reply to the cover letter I will have to rework this patch series so I'm not sure whether it's useful that I make patch 53/53 available now. Thanks, Bart.