From: "Austin, Alex (DCCG)" <alex.austin@amd.com>
To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
Cc: ecree.xilinx@gmail.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, richardcochran@gmail.com, alucerop@amd.com,
pieter.jansen-van-vuuren@amd.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-net-drivers@amd.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 1/3] sfc: ptp: drop the stale frequency reset in efx_ptp_start()
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 14:45:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d996b3d-c205-4bfd-963d-4698af571bff@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179336480940.3134.13795222150880092351@kernel.org>
On 30/10/2026 12:53, netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org wrote:
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>
>
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
> issue(s) to consider.
>
> Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 1 (1) · Low: 0 (1)
>
> If you believe none of the issues are legitimate, please reply to each
> issue of Medium severity or higher and explain why the AI is wrong.
> If any of them are legitimate and you plan to respin, please let patchwork
> know by including "pw-bot: cr" as a separate line at the end of your reply
> (one such reply per series is enough).
>
> - [Medium] The fix only changes the EF10/EF100 copy of efx_ptp_start() in
> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ptp.c.
>
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [Medium] At this commit, efx_phc_adjtime() reads
> ptp_data->current_adjfreq (drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ptp.c:2129) and…
> - [Low] The kernel-doc for struct efx_ptp_data says `@current_adjfreq:
> Current ppb adjustment.` (drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ptp.c:272, and…
>
> --
>
> sfc: ptp: drop the stale frequency reset in efx_ptp_start()
>
> This commit stops efx_ptp_start() from clearing the cached
> current_adjfreq. Firmware keeps the clock frequency across PTP disable
> and enable. Clearing the cache made the next efx_phc_adjtime() set the
> NIC's frequency trim back to 0.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ptp.c
>> index 00cfd8d5b46ea..957ca08092e7f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ptp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ptp.c
>> @@ -1445,7 +1445,6 @@ static int efx_ptp_start(struct efx_nic *efx)
>> goto fail;
>>
>> ptp->evt_frag_idx = 0;
>> - ptp->current_adjfreq = 0;
> [Severity: Medium]
> Should the Siena copy of efx_ptp_start() get the same change? The Siena
> version still clears the cache right after efx_ptp_enable() succeeds:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/siena/ptp.c:efx_ptp_start() {
> ...
> rc = efx_ptp_enable(efx);
> if (rc != 0)
> goto fail;
>
> ptp->evt_frag_idx = 0;
> ptp->current_adjfreq = 0;
> ...
> }
>
> Siena's efx_phc_adjtime() also sends the cached value with every time
> step:
>
> MCDI_SET_QWORD(inbuf, PTP_IN_ADJUST_FREQ, ptp_data->current_adjfreq);
>
> On Siena, all the paths named in the commit message still reach that
> reset:
>
> efx_siena_ptp_change_mode() -> efx_ptp_start() (SIOCSHWTSTAMP)
> efx_ptp_restart() -> efx_ptp_start() (ifup, reset recovery)
> efx_ptp_worker() -> efx_ptp_start() (reset_required)
>
> So the next adjtime or settime would set the Siena NIC's frequency trim to
> 0. Meanwhile the servo and the PTP core still hold the old value.
>
> The Fixes: tag points at 7c236c43b838, which added this code for Siena
> hardware. The later patches in the series ("sfc: ptp: serialize host and
> MC synchronization transactions" and "sfc: ptp: avoid racing PPS
> timestamp updates") don't touch siena/ptp.c either.
>
> This assumes Siena MC firmware also keeps the frequency across
> MC_CMD_PTP_OP_DISABLE and MC_CMD_PTP_OP_ENABLE. The commit message only
> says this for the firmware it targets. Does Siena firmware behave the
> same way? If so, should drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/siena/ptp.c be fixed as
> well?
>
From inspection, it looks like the same issue exists on Siena. I think we
should take care of Siena issues in a separate patchset. Additionally, I
don't have a Siena NIC handy to test on.
[...]
> [Severity: Medium]
> This is a pre-existing issue, but now that efx_phc_adjtime() relies only
> on the cached value, can a concurrent adjtime and adjfine leave the cache
> out of sync with firmware?
>
> At this commit, nothing serializes these two accesses:
>
> efx_phc_adjtime():
> MCDI_SET_QWORD(inbuf, PTP_IN_ADJUST_FREQ, ptp_data->current_adjfreq);
>
> efx_phc_adjfine():
> rc = efx_mcdi_rpc(efx, MC_CMD_PTP, inadj, sizeof(inadj),
> NULL, 0, NULL);
> ...
> ptp_data->current_adjfreq = adjustment_ns;
>
> posix_clock_adjtime() only takes the clock rwsem for read. So an adjtime
> can read the old frequency F0 before an adjfine programs F1. Its RPC then
> writes F0 back into firmware while the cache holds F1.
>
> The next patch in the series, "sfc: ptp: serialize host and MC
> synchronization transactions", appears to fix this. It adds
> ptp_data->phc_lock, holds it around the RPC and the cache update in
> efx_phc_adjfine(), and runs _efx_phc_adjtime() under the same lock.
Yes, this is fixed in the next patch.
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20261026123023.3566549-1-alex.austin%40amd.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-30 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-26 12:30 [PATCH net v4 0/3] sfc: fix PTP synchronization races Alex Austin
2026-10-26 12:30 ` [PATCH net v4 1/3] sfc: ptp: drop the stale frequency reset in efx_ptp_start() Alex Austin
2026-10-30 12:53 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-30 14:45 ` Austin, Alex (DCCG) [this message]
2026-10-26 12:30 ` [PATCH net v4 2/3] sfc: ptp: serialize host and MC synchronization transactions Alex Austin
2026-10-30 12:53 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-30 14:50 ` Austin, Alex (DCCG)
2026-10-26 12:30 ` [PATCH net v4 3/3] sfc: ptp: avoid racing PPS timestamp updates Alex Austin
2026-10-30 12:53 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-30 14:52 ` Austin, Alex (DCCG)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d996b3d-c205-4bfd-963d-4698af571bff@amd.com \
--to=alex.austin@amd.com \
--cc=alucerop@amd.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ecree.xilinx@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net-drivers@amd.com \
--cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pieter.jansen-van-vuuren@amd.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®