From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Linmao Li" <lilinmao@kylinos.cn>,
"Sudip Mukherjee" <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppdev: prevent overflow when setting port timeout
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 08:33:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3da6045d-de5e-4d8c-8a78-c22d89f7c8d1@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260716013923.19494-1-lilinmao@kylinos.cn>
On Thu, Jul 16, 2026, at 03:39, Linmao Li wrote:
> PPSETTIME64 supplies the timeval fields as s64 values, but
> pp_set_timeout() narrows tv_usec to int and calculates tv_sec * HZ in a
> signed long. Large positive values can therefore be truncated or overflow
> and install an unintended timeout.
>
> Keep both fields as s64, reject a non-canonical microsecond value, and
> use timespec64_to_jiffies() to cap excessively large timeouts at
> MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET. This is a behavior change because both PPSETTIME
> ioctls could previously accept values with tv_usec >= USEC_PER_SEC.
> The validation follows the precedent set by sock_set_timeout().
>
> Fixes: 3b9ab374a1e6 ("ppdev: convert to y2038 safe")
> Signed-off-by: Linmao Li <lilinmao@kylinos.cn>
Good catch!
> - to_jiffies = usecs_to_jiffies(tv_usec);
> - to_jiffies += tv_sec * HZ;
> + ts.tv_sec = tv_sec;
> + ts.tv_nsec = tv_usec * NSEC_PER_USEC;
> + to_jiffies = timespec64_to_jiffies(&ts);
> if (to_jiffies <= 0)
> return -EINVAL;
This is a bit more expensive, but it's clearly not performance
critical and I agree that the added range checking is a
nice improvement here.
I also checked codesearch.debian.net to see if any callers
might rely on passing out-of-range arguments, but the only
caller I found (pyparallel) is guaranteed to pass a
normalized timeval.
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-16 6:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-16 1:39 Linmao Li
2026-07-16 6:33 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3da6045d-de5e-4d8c-8a78-c22d89f7c8d1@app.fastmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=lilinmao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®