mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] checkpatch: Add a warning for log messages that don't end in a new line
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 15:56:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ddea7e4-24bd-eadc-18ff-ab5aa5d81e58@deltatee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711272146310.2405@hadrien>



On 27/11/17 01:49 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Perhaps if there is a possible flow from one print to another within a
> single function and in both cases the format string is at least say 25
> characters (completely random value), then it is pretty likely that a
> newline is intended.

This is on the edge of what I think could be done with checkpatch. I did 
a quick look through some of the cases I've noticed and haven't found 
any that this wouldn't pass. I'm not sure how you'd pick an appropriate 
threshold though. I do think it's quite clever, though.

> Alternatively, if the first format string doesn't end in a space and the
> second one doesn't begin with a space, then a newline is also likely
> intended.

This makes more sense to me but I don't expect it to be 100% accurate 
either. See, for example, drivers/char/dtlk.c:640 which has no space in 
either printk. You could maybe expand the rule to include ':' and '(' as 
the last character.

Logan

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-27 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-26  5:40 Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-26  5:51 ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-26  6:01   ` Joe Perches
2017-11-26 17:38     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-26 22:29       ` Joe Perches
     [not found]         ` <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711262334370.2111@hadrien>
2017-11-27  1:12           ` Joe Perches
2017-11-27  6:08             ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-27  9:25               ` Joe Perches
2017-11-27  9:32                 ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-27  9:42                   ` Joe Perches
2017-11-27 17:07                 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27 17:26                   ` Joe Perches
2017-11-27 17:33                     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27 17:41                       ` Joe Perches
2017-11-27 17:42                         ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27  4:00         ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27  6:11           ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-27  6:27             ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27  6:34               ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-27  6:40                 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27  8:28                   ` Joe Perches
2017-11-27  8:52                     ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-27  9:06                       ` Joe Perches
2017-11-27 16:40                       ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27 17:20                     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27 17:28                       ` Joe Perches
2017-11-27 17:35                         ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27 17:42                           ` Joe Perches
2017-11-27 17:44                             ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27 18:57                               ` Joe Perches
2017-11-27 19:58                                 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27 20:49                                   ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-27 22:56                                     ` Logan Gunthorpe [this message]
2017-11-28  0:15                                   ` Joe Perches
2017-11-26 16:55   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-26 17:09     ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-26 17:47       ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-26 18:17         ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-26 18:33           ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27  1:35           ` Joe Perches
2017-11-27  6:40             ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-27  6:42               ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-27  6:53                 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27  6:57                   ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-27  9:03                 ` Joe Perches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3ddea7e4-24bd-eadc-18ff-ab5aa5d81e58@deltatee.com \
    --to=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=apw@canonical.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®