From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: NTP adjustments to CLOCK_MONATONIC
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:13:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3df4f582304949648e104a2837555bad@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
I've just noticed some strange behaviour of some code that is
comparing CLOCK_MONATONIC to a second (external) clock source.
Normally the difference is between +/-200ns in 10ms.
Which is well within the ppm errors of the crystals.
However for around 90 seconds after system boot the error
was massive - I have to force a difference of around 8000ns/10ms
to see similar behaviour.
The only explanation I can guess at is that it was subject
to NTP's maximum slew rate of 0.5ms/sec (1/2000) while NTP
was aligning CLOCK_REALTIME.
While the NTP adjustments for clock frequency drift aren't
unreasonable for CLOCK_MONATONIC, including the adjustments
for the boot time offset is rather horrid.
In this case they stopped after 90 seconds, but a bigger
offset could take hours (or even days?) to clear.
This rather breaks what timekeeping.rst says about CLOCK_MONATONIC
being useful for 'reliable timestamps and measuring short time
intervals accurately'.
Any idea what happens to CLOCK_MONATONIC over a leap second?
Its offset to CLOCK_REALTIME should really change by 1 second.
I can't use CLOCK_MONATONIC_RAW because the hrtimer code
doesn't support it.
There are also programs that need to do things (like send RTP)
every 20ms - not every 20.01ms.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
reply other threads:[~2020-08-27 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3df4f582304949648e104a2837555bad@AcuMS.aculab.com \
--to=david.laight@aculab.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®