From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Nico Pache <nico.pache@linux.dev>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/4] kselftest: mm: integrate huge page checks
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 13:40:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e03425b-7962-4c69-93aa-96168fd7168e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aruMgm8UZ_t2V_wh@e129823.arm.com>
On 9/29/26 12:01, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 10:07:37AM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>> On 9/24/26 21:11, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
>>> check_large_folios() only checks for large folios without distinguishing
>>> between anonymous and file-backed huge pages.
>>>
>>> To add huge page type checking, integrate the huge page checks into
>>> __check_huge():
>>>
>>> 1. If hpage_size == pmd_pagesize, check PAGE_IS_HUGE instead of using
>>> check_large_folios(), since only the mapping type matters. This
>>> identifies PMD-mapped huge pages.
>>>
>>> 2. Otherwise, use check_large_folios() to detect large folios. This
>>> covers mTHP cases.
>>>
>>> 3. Check the folio flags according to the huge page type.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
>>> Suggested-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Instead of merging both things (detecting mapping vs. detecting anon vs. file),
>> could we simply perform the anon vs. file change separately?
>>
>> Doing another pagemap walk that focuses on that should end up with something
>> that is easier to read.
>
> Okay. I'll change like below in next-spin:
>
> -------&<-------
>
> @@ -411,57 +400,78 @@ static bool check_huge_type(uint64_t categories, enum check_huge_type type)
> return false;
> }
>
> -static bool __check_pmd_huge(void *addr, size_t len, int nr_hpages,
> - uint64_t hpage_size, enum check_huge_type type)
> +static bool __check_huge(void *addr, size_t len, int nr_hpages,
> + uint64_t hpage_size, enum check_huge_type type)
> {
> {
> - int pagemap_fd;
> + bool ret = false;
> + int pagemap_fd, kpageflags_fd;
> int nr_pmd_mappings = 0;
> + uint64_t pmd_pagesize, scan_mapping_size;
> uint64_t categories;
> + unsigned long pfn;
> + bool check_pmd_mapping, allow_nonpresent;
> char *start = addr;
> char *end = start + len;
>
> + pmd_pagesize = read_pmd_pagesize();
> + if (!pmd_pagesize)
> + ksft_exit_fail_msg("reading PMD pagesize failed\n");
> +
> + check_pmd_mapping = hpage_size == pmd_pagesize;
> + scan_mapping_size = (nr_hpages > 0) ? hpage_size : psize();
> + /* Some mTHP tests check a partially populated PMD-sized range. */
> + allow_nonpresent = (uint64_t)nr_hpages * hpage_size < len;
> +
> pagemap_fd = open(PAGEMAP_PATH, O_RDONLY);
> if (pagemap_fd < 0)
> ksft_exit_fail_perror("open pagemap");
>
> - for (; start < end; start += hpage_size) {
> + kpageflags_fd = open(KPAGEFLAGS_PATH, O_RDONLY);
> + if (kpageflags_fd < 0)
> + ksft_exit_fail_perror("open kpageflags");
> +
> + for (; start < end; start += scan_mapping_size) {
> categories = pagemap_scan_get_categories(pagemap_fd, start);
> - if (!(categories & PAGE_IS_HUGE))
> + pfn = pagemap_get_pfn(pagemap_fd, start);
> + if (pfn == -1UL) {
> + if (!allow_nonpresent)
> + goto out;
> continue;
> - if (check_huge_type(categories, type))
> + }
> + if (!check_huge_type(categories, type))
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (!check_pmd_mapping) {
> + ret = check_large_folios(pagemap_fd, kpageflags_fd,
> + addr, len, nr_hpages, hpage_size);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + for (start = addr; start < end; start += scan_mapping_size) {
> + categories = pagemap_scan_get_categories(pagemap_fd, start);
> + if (categories & PAGE_IS_HUGE)
> nr_pmd_mappings++;
> }
> - close(pagemap_fd);
>
> - return nr_hpages == nr_pmd_mappings;
> + if (nr_pmd_mappings != nr_hpages)
> + goto out;
> + ret = true;
> +
> +out:
> + close(pagemap_fd);
> + close(kpageflags_fd);
> + return ret;
> }
>
I'd leave existing __check_huge() mostly alone, and instead have an additional
function that checks the type.
Essentially a __check_type() or sth that we run after the large folio / pmd check.
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 19:11 [PATCH v8 0/4] kselftest: mm: fix some failure of split_huge_page_test Yeoreum Yun
2026-09-24 19:11 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] kselftest: mm: prevent random failure of huge page split for khugepaged Yeoreum Yun
2026-09-25 12:10 ` Sarthak Sharma
2026-09-25 14:25 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-09-24 19:11 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] kselftest: mm: replace usage of /proc/self/smaps for __check_pmd_huge() Yeoreum Yun
2026-09-25 12:38 ` Sarthak Sharma
2026-09-25 14:23 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-09-28 12:46 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-29 6:36 ` Baolin Wang
2026-09-29 15:20 ` Zi Yan
2026-09-24 19:11 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] kselftest: mm: integrate huge page checks Yeoreum Yun
2026-09-25 12:54 ` Sarthak Sharma
2026-09-29 6:45 ` Baolin Wang
2026-09-29 8:07 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-29 10:01 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-01 11:40 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-10-01 13:52 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-01 19:59 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-10-01 21:09 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-09-24 19:11 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] kselftest: mm: remove check_huge_shmem() Yeoreum Yun
2026-09-25 12:56 ` Sarthak Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3e03425b-7962-4c69-93aa-96168fd7168e@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=nico.pache@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®