From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ECF129A2; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 10:53:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.188 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724669631; cv=none; b=jCoitjs+T4ZA4/jx7/6WZXj/26elVXnqJ6GKmEFQJN92C/c3TfQPABdrAzsLshVibS8H4maborotPJ5GB4MpA4d2RDOhxFtV5udDEjcWqN1TvnuSjQQ7Ng81T6zQ07Ojv1wCzPBWX9Gslft77Wxn7FIYwgs53aU8Zeb9C29deak= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724669631; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rbLDSLzqYVWDbIAJ0gQcb0pY+30c68c0iGZfrbxw1B0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Hpwid4d5GpjM2Ds7klO/et+9F8YMSOROKLcaNyFuSpQuIW8Ab84A65eMWaAPYvBWeHw66wSc4C+ajQZA7qETiuU3W8HuKqzWiNqmVzWfIiUApnllzM26E8dWigIQRRV+x/rjwANACxFDosN8JBopSmNXYvk5S17WkSG9F2FE8Y0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.188 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.252]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4WsnYB2s0kzhXc8; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:51:42 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemh500013.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.202.181.146]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FD851800A7; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:53:45 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.109.254] (10.67.109.254) by kwepemh500013.china.huawei.com (7.202.181.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:53:43 +0800 Message-ID: <3e0ba029-d658-be41-77ac-6edec75762d1@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:53:42 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RESEND 00/10] mtd: Use for_each_child_of_node_scoped() Content-Language: en-US To: Miquel Raynal CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , References: <20240826094328.2991664-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> <20240826115213.389acaef@xps-13> From: Jinjie Ruan In-Reply-To: <20240826115213.389acaef@xps-13> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.180) To kwepemh500013.china.huawei.com (7.202.181.146) On 2024/8/26 17:52, Miquel Raynal wrote: > Hi Jinjie, > > ruanjinjie@huawei.com wrote on Mon, 26 Aug 2024 17:43:18 +0800: > >> Use scoped for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() when iterating over >> device nodes to make code a bit simpler. > > Why is this a resend ? Did I miss a previous iteration? Hi Miquel, The previous cc list has missing some entries. > > Thanks, > Miquèl