mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Enderborg, Peter" <Peter.Enderborg@sony.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debugfs: Add mount restriction option
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 08:39:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e1be4dc-01d4-7fc5-1c82-1c792d3fbc11@sony.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200528082753.GA2920930@kroah.com>

On 5/28/20 10:27 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 10:00:31AM +0200, Peter Enderborg wrote:
>> Since debugfs include sensitive information it need to be treated
>> carefully. But it also has many very useful debug functions for userspace.
>> With this option we can have same configuration for system with
>> need of debugfs and a way to turn it off. It is needed new
>> kernel command line parameter to be activated.
> By "configuration" do you mean "kernel configuration"?  What is wrong
> with relying on the build option like we do today?
>
> You might want to reword all of this to make more sense about the
> "problem" you are trying to solve here, as I don't really understand it,
> sorry.
>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Enderborg <peter.enderborg@sony.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/debugfs/inode.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>>  lib/Kconfig.debug  | 10 ++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> No documentation update?  That's not good :(
>
>
>> diff --git a/fs/debugfs/inode.c b/fs/debugfs/inode.c
>> index b7f2e971ecbc..bde37dab77e0 100644
>> --- a/fs/debugfs/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/debugfs/inode.c
>> @@ -786,10 +786,25 @@ bool debugfs_initialized(void)
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debugfs_initialized);
>>  
>> +static int allow_debugfs;
>> +
>> +static int __init debugfs_kernel(char *str)
>> +{
>> +	if (str && !strcmp(str, "true"))
>> +		allow_debugfs = true;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +
>> +}
>> +early_param("debugfs", debugfs_kernel);
>> +
>>  static int __init debugfs_init(void)
>>  {
>>  	int retval;
>> -
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS_MOUNT_RESTRICTED
>> +	if (!allow_debugfs)
>> +		return -EPERM;
>> +#endif
> But you are not restricting the ability to mount it here, you are
> removing the ability for it to even start up at all.  What does this
> break for code that thinks the filesystem is registered (i.e. the call
> to simple_pin_fs() in start_creating() in fs/debugfs/inode.c?
>
If it does, the lines below is also cause the same problem.


>
>>  	retval = sysfs_create_mount_point(kernel_kobj, "debug");
>>  	if (retval)
>>  		return retval;
>> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
>> index 21d9c5f6e7ec..d3a3338740d2 100644
>> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
>> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
>> @@ -443,6 +443,16 @@ config DEBUG_FS
>>  
>>  	  If unsure, say N.
>>  
>> +config DEBUG_FS_MOUNT_RESTRICTED
>> +	bool "Debug Filesystem mount restricted"
>> +	depends on DEBUG_FS
>> +	help
>> +	  This is an additional restriction for mounting debugfs. It allows
>> +	  the kernel to have debugfs compiled, but requires that kernel command
>> +	  line has a debugfs parameter to register as a filesystem.
>> +
>> +	  If unsure, say N.
> No hint as to what the command line option is?  And again, it's not a
> restriction for mounting it, you are preventing it from initializing
> entirely.
>
> Which, as I have found out over time, can had side affects for codepaths
> that try to check the return value of debugfs calls, and if they fail to
> succeed, abort the whole driver/subsystem/whatever initializaion path,
> which is not what I think you want to do here at all.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-28  8:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-28  8:00 Peter Enderborg
2020-05-28  8:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-28  8:39   ` Enderborg, Peter [this message]
2020-05-28  9:27     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-28 12:04       ` Enderborg, Peter
2020-05-28 12:23         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-28 12:41           ` Enderborg, Peter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3e1be4dc-01d4-7fc5-1c82-1c792d3fbc11@sony.com \
    --to=peter.enderborg@sony.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®