Re: [PATCH 06/20] x86/msr: Standardize on 'u32' MSR indices in <asm/msr.h>

[Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>]

On 4/9/2025 8:29 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On April 9, 2025 8:18:12 PM PDT, Xin Li <xin@zytor.com> wrote:
>> A question NOT related to this patch set, the MSR write API prototype
>> defined in struct pv_cpu_ops as:
>>     void (*write_msr)(unsigned int msr, unsigned low, unsigned high);
>>
>> Will it be better to add "const" to its arguments?  I.e.,
>>     void (*write_msr)(const u32 msr, const u32 low, const u32 high);
>>
> 
> No, that makes no sense (it would have absolutely no effect.)
> 

For the API definition, yes, it has no effect.

While it makes the API definition more explicit, and its implementations
for native and Xen would be:

void {native,xen}_write_msr(const u32 msr, const u32 low, const u32 high)
{
     ....
}

not worth it at all?