From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6CE7C433FE for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2022 07:19:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1350249AbiFAHTZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2022 03:19:25 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36626 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1350234AbiFAHTX (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2022 03:19:23 -0400 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.189]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 645C14DF4A; Wed, 1 Jun 2022 00:19:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kwepemi500013.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.53]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4LCgW02QC4zDqYc; Wed, 1 Jun 2022 15:19:08 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemm600009.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.164) by kwepemi500013.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Wed, 1 Jun 2022 15:19:19 +0800 Received: from [10.174.176.73] (10.174.176.73) by kwepemm600009.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.164) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Wed, 1 Jun 2022 15:19:18 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v5 0/3] support concurrent sync io for bfq on a specail occasion To: Jens Axboe , Jan Kara CC: , , , , , References: <20220428120837.3737765-1-yukuai3@huawei.com> <61b67d5e-829c-8130-7bda-81615d654829@huawei.com> <81411289-e13c-20f5-df63-c059babca57a@huawei.com> <55919e29-1f22-e8aa-f3d2-08c57d9e1c22@huawei.com> <20220523085902.wmxoebyq3crerecr@quack3.lan> <25f6703e-9e10-75d9-a893-6df1e6b75254@kernel.dk> <20220523152516.7sr247i3bzwhr44w@quack3.lan> <13ad158e-7859-ca61-209e-7d1fe99d0bdb@huawei.com> <03b3a6bc-586a-2b45-a60c-5ab81076bf13@kernel.dk> From: Yu Kuai Message-ID: <3e2bc90f-464d-f80d-a624-5337af420ec9@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 15:19:17 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <03b3a6bc-586a-2b45-a60c-5ab81076bf13@kernel.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.176.73] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To kwepemm600009.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.164) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 在 2022/06/01 14:16, Jens Axboe 写道: > On 5/23/22 7:13 PM, Yu Kuai wrote: >> ? 2022/05/23 23:25, Jan Kara ??: >>> On Mon 23-05-22 06:36:58, Jens Axboe wrote: >>>> On 5/23/22 2:59 AM, Jan Kara wrote: >>>>> On Mon 23-05-22 09:10:38, yukuai (C) wrote: >>>>>> ? 2022/05/21 20:21, Jens Axboe ??: >>>>>>> On 5/21/22 1:22 AM, yukuai (C) wrote: >>>>>>>> ? 2022/05/14 17:29, yukuai (C) ??: >>>>>>>>> ? 2022/05/05 9:00, yukuai (C) ??: >>>>>>>>>> Hi, Paolo >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Can you take a look at this patchset? It has been quite a long time >>>>>>>>>> since we spotted this problem... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> friendly ping ... >>>>>>>> friendly ping ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I can't speak for Paolo, but I've mentioned before that the majority >>>>>>> of your messages end up in my spam. That's still the case, in fact >>>>>>> I just marked maybe 10 of them as not spam. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You really need to get this issued sorted out, or you will continue >>>>>>> to have patches ignore because folks may simply not see them. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for your notice. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is it just me or do you see someone else's messages from *huawei.com >>>>>> end up in spam? I tried to seek help from our IT support, however, they >>>>>> didn't find anything unusual... >>>>> >>>>> So actually I have noticed that a lot of (valid) email from huawei.com (not >>>>> just you) ends up in the spam mailbox. For me direct messages usually pass >>>>> (likely matching SPF records for originating mail server save the email >>>>> from going to spam) but messages going through mailing lists are flagged as >>>>> spam because the emails are missing valid DKIM signature but huawei.com >>>>> DMARC config says there should be DKIM signature (even direct messages are >>>>> missing DKIM so this does not seem as a mailing list configuration issue). >>>>> So this seems as some misconfiguration of the mails on huawei.com side >>>>> (likely missing DKIM signing of outgoing email). >>>> >>>> SPF/DKIM was indeed a problem earlier for yukaui patches, but I don't >>>> see that anymore. Maybe it's still an issue for some emails, from them >>>> or Huawei in general? >>> >>> Hum, for me all emails from Huawei I've received even today fail the DKIM >>> check. After some more digging there is interesting inconsistency in DMARC >>> configuration for huawei.com domain. There is DMARC record for huawei.com >>> like: >>> >>> huawei.com. 600 IN TXT "v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc@edm.huawei.com" >>> >>> which means no DKIM is required but _dmarc.huawei.com has: >>> >>> _dmarc.huawei.com. 600 IN TXT "v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;ruf=mailto:dmarc@huawei.com;rua=mailto:dmarc@huawei.com" >>> >>> which says that DKIM is required. I guess this inconsistency may be the >>> reason why there are problems with DKIM validation for senders from >>> huawei.com. Yu Kuai, can you perhaps take this to your IT support to fix >>> this? Either make sure huawei.com emails get properly signed with DKIM or >>> remove the 'quarantine' record from _dmarc.huawei.com. Thanks! >> Of course, I'll try to contact our IT support. > > I second that, pretty much every email has been going into spam since, I > guess you just had a few lucky ones. Looks like Jan is right, it's a > server side configuration error that's causing this, and it's still > happening > Thanks for your response 😄 I aready contack our IT support, and hopefully this can be solved soon...