From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>, Xu Xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>,
Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm: prevent KSM from completely breaking VMA merging
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 20:04:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e2d3bbb-8610-41d3-9aee-5a7bba3f2ce8@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e5d0b98f-6d9c-4409-82cd-7d23dc7c3bda@redhat.com>
>> +/*
>> + * Are we guaranteed no driver can change state such as to preclude KSM merging?
>> + * If so, let's set the KSM mergeable flag early so we don't break VMA merging.
>> + *
>> + * This is applicable when PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE has been set on the mm_struct via
>> + * prctl() causing newly mapped VMAs to have the KSM mergeable VMA flag set.
>> + *
>> + * If this is not the case, then we set the flag after considering mergeability,
>> + * which will prevent mergeability as, when PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE is set, a new
>> + * VMA will not have the KSM mergeability VMA flag set, but all other VMAs will,
>> + * preventing any merge.
>
> Hmmm, so an ordinary MAP_PRIVATE of any file (executable etc.) will get
> VM_MERGEABLE set but not be able to merge?
>
> Probably these are not often expected to be merged ...
>
> Preventing merging should really only happen because of VMA flags that
> are getting set: VM_PFNMAP, VM_MIXEDMAP, VM_DONTEXPAND, VM_IO.
>
>
> I am not 100% sure why we bail out on special mappings: all we have to
> do is reliably identify anon pages, and we should be able to do that.
>
> GUP does currently refuses any VM_PFNMAP | VM_IO, and KSM uses GUP,
> which might need a tweak then (maybe the solution could be to ... not
> use GUP but a folio_walk).
Oh, someone called "David" already did that. Nice :)
So we *should* be able to drop
* VM_PFNMAP: we correctly identify CoWed pages
* VM_MIXEDMAP: we correctly identify CoWed pages
* VM_IO: should not affect CoWed pages
* VM_DONTEXPAND: no idea why that should even matter here
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-19 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-19 8:51 [PATCH 0/4] mm: ksm: prevent KSM from entirely " Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-19 8:51 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: ksm: have KSM VMA checks not require a VMA pointer Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-19 17:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-20 3:14 ` Chengming Zhou
2025-05-19 8:51 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: ksm: refer to special VMAs via VM_SPECIAL in ksm_compatible() Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-19 17:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-20 3:15 ` Chengming Zhou
2025-05-19 8:51 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: prevent KSM from completely breaking VMA merging Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-19 13:08 ` Chengming Zhou
2025-05-19 13:13 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-19 13:19 ` kernel test robot
2025-05-19 13:36 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-19 18:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-19 18:04 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-05-19 19:02 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-19 19:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-19 19:26 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-19 19:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-19 18:52 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-19 18:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-19 19:14 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-19 19:18 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-19 19:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-19 21:57 ` Andrew Morton
2025-05-20 5:25 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-20 3:55 ` Chengming Zhou
2025-05-20 5:24 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-19 8:51 ` [PATCH 4/4] tools/testing/selftests: add VMA merge tests for KSM merge Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-21 8:07 ` Chengming Zhou
2025-05-21 8:10 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-19 11:53 ` [PATCH 0/4] mm: ksm: prevent KSM from entirely breaking VMA merging David Hildenbrand
2025-05-19 11:56 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3e2d3bbb-8610-41d3-9aee-5a7bba3f2ce8@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®