From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>,
"Maciej Wieczor-Retman" <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
Drew Fustini <dfustini@baylibre.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
David E Box <david.e.box@intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 17/23] arm,x86/resctrl: Resolve INTEL_PMT_TELEMETRY symbols at runtime
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 21:07:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e81402c-902b-4499-8358-26077a8535ee@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831174421.13921-18-tony.luck@intel.com>
Hi Tony,
On 8/31/26 10:44 AM, Tony Luck wrote:
> resctrl is always built-in, but INTEL_PMT_TELEMETRY and INTEL_TPMI are
> logically independent and should be loadable modules. Switch AET to use the
> function-pointer registration API instead of direct link-time references to
> PMT symbols.
>
> Prepare for the file system to call resctrl_arch_pre_mount() on every mount
> by moving AET enumeration into resctrl_arch_pre_mount() and cleanup into
> resctrl_arch_unmount(). This allows the PMT module to be unloaded whenever
> the filesystem is not mounted.
>
> intel_aet_exit() was never called because resctrl is built into the kernel. All
> cleanup is now handled in the unmount path. Remove intel_aet_exit().
>
> Note that the Linux file system code does not serialize calls to
> fs_context_operations::get_tree(), so there may be arbitrarily many parallel
> calls if users invoke mount(2) multiple times.
>
> Zero rdt_resource::resctrl_mon::num_rmid for RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG so
> that it will be re-computed next mount.
>
> event_group::num_rmid may be reset (reduced) during enumeration. This is
> not worth resetting on unmount because the same reduction would occur on
> each subsequent mount.
>
> Place a hold on the pmt_telemetry while enumerating AET events during
"on the pmt_telemetry" -> "on the pmt_telemetry module"?
> pre-mount processing. Release the hold if no events were enabled.
> Otherwise keep the hold until the resctrl file system is unmounted.
Same comment as previous version: this "hold" is asymmetric in this patch since
the unmount code is introduced here, but never called. Could you please describe
in changelog why this is ok?
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> ---
> v11:
> Drop unneeded include of <linux/cleanup.h> from core.c
> Comment on data protected by aet_register_lock
> Add commit comment on module{get,put} activity
>
> include/linux/resctrl.h | 6 +++
This change implies fs/resctrl is needed in subject prefix also.
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 8 ++--
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c | 24 ++++++++--
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c | 4 ++
> 5 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/resctrl.h b/include/linux/resctrl.h
> index 4fb06d434c85..0d7fd294b760 100644
> --- a/include/linux/resctrl.h
> +++ b/include/linux/resctrl.h
> @@ -591,6 +591,12 @@ void resctrl_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> */
> void resctrl_arch_pre_mount(void);
>
> +/*
> + * Architecture hook called when mount fails, or on unmount.
> + * No locks are held.
> + */
> +void resctrl_arch_unmount(void);
> +
> /**
> * resctrl_arch_rmid_read() - Read the eventid counter corresponding to rmid
> * for this resource and domain.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index 27dc27480f6e..4409ee20474d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -234,17 +234,17 @@ void rdt_domain_reconfigure_cdp(struct rdt_resource *r);
> void resctrl_arch_mbm_cntr_assign_set_one(struct rdt_resource *r);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_CPU_RESCTRL_INTEL_AET
> -bool intel_aet_get_events(void);
> void __init intel_aet_init(void);
> -void __exit intel_aet_exit(void);
> +bool intel_aet_pre_mount(void);
> +void intel_aet_unmount(void);
> int intel_aet_read_event(int domid, u32 rmid, void *arch_priv, u64 *val);
> void intel_aet_mon_domain_setup(int cpu, int id, struct rdt_resource *r,
> struct list_head *add_pos);
> bool intel_handle_aet_option(bool force_off, char *tok);
> #else
> -static inline bool intel_aet_get_events(void) { return false; }
> static inline void intel_aet_init(void) { }
> -static inline void __exit intel_aet_exit(void) { }
> +static inline bool intel_aet_pre_mount(void) { return false; }
> +static inline void intel_aet_unmount(void) { }
> static inline int intel_aet_read_event(int domid, u32 rmid, void *arch_priv, u64 *val)
> {
> return -EINVAL;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> index 8b763cf638ef..cdcc5611345f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/cpuhotplug.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
>
> #include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
> #include <asm/cpuid/api.h>
> @@ -800,7 +801,7 @@ void resctrl_arch_pre_mount(void)
> struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG].r_resctrl;
> int cpu;
>
> - if (!intel_aet_get_events())
> + if (!intel_aet_pre_mount())
> return;
>
> /*
> @@ -816,6 +817,25 @@ void resctrl_arch_pre_mount(void)
> cpus_read_unlock();
> }
>
> +void resctrl_arch_unmount(void)
> +{
> + struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG].r_resctrl;
> + int cpu;
> +
> + if (!r->mon_capable)
> + return;
Since resctrl_arch_unmount() is introduced but not called it is difficult to reason about
the safety of r->mon_capable accessed here without, what appears to be, any locks held.
> +
> + intel_aet_unmount();
> +
> + cpus_read_lock();
> + mutex_lock(&domain_list_lock);
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> + domain_remove_cpu_mon(cpu, r);
> + r->mon_capable = false;
> + mutex_unlock(&domain_list_lock);
> + cpus_read_unlock();
> +}
> +
> enum {
> RDT_FLAG_CMT,
> RDT_FLAG_MBM_TOTAL,
> @@ -1160,8 +1180,6 @@ late_initcall(resctrl_arch_late_init);
>
> static void __exit resctrl_arch_exit(void)
> {
> - intel_aet_exit();
> -
> cpuhp_remove_state(rdt_online);
>
> resctrl_exit();
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> index f5007bea8346..c3bd3536c514 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "resctrl: " fmt
>
> #include <linux/bits.h>
> +#include <linux/cleanup.h>
> #include <linux/compiler_types.h>
> #include <linux/container_of.h>
> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> @@ -25,6 +26,7 @@
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/minmax.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> #include <linux/printk.h>
> #include <linux/rculist.h>
> #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> @@ -293,10 +295,22 @@ static enum pmt_feature_id lookup_pfid(const char *pfname)
> return FEATURE_INVALID;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Protects pmt_module, get_feature, put_feature against races between module
> + * load/unload of the pmt_telemetry module and mount/unmount of the resctrl
> + * file system. Also protects pmt_in_use.
Thank you for adding this. This accurately reflects what aet_register_lock protects
in *this* patch. aet_register_lock protects more as this series progresses from here,
could you please update this text as this mutex protects more and more?
> + */
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(aet_register_lock);
> +
> static struct module *pmt_module;
> static struct pmt_feature_group *(*get_feature)(enum pmt_feature_id id);
> static void (*put_feature)(struct pmt_feature_group *p);
>
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 4:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 17:43 [PATCH v11 00/23] Allow AET to use PMT as loadable module Tony Luck
2026-08-31 17:43 ` [PATCH v11 01/23] x86/resctrl: Give better names to X86_FEATURE flags for monitoring Tony Luck
2026-09-10 3:48 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-09-11 0:06 ` Luck, Tony
2026-09-11 15:56 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-09-11 18:21 ` Luck, Tony
2026-09-11 22:51 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-08-31 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 02/23] x86/resctrl: Check if monitoring features are enabled Tony Luck
2026-09-10 3:52 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-09-11 19:11 ` Luck, Tony
2026-09-11 23:08 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-08-31 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 03/23] x86/resctrl: Enumerate monitor features in rdt_get_l3_mon_config() Tony Luck
2026-09-10 3:54 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-08-31 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 04/23] x86/resctrl: Apply Intel MBM quirk from rdt_get_l3_mon_config() Tony Luck
2026-09-10 3:55 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-08-31 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 05/23] x86/resctrl: Delete resctrl_cpu_detect() Tony Luck
2026-08-31 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 06/23] arm,x86,fs/resctrl: Replace architecture resctrl_arch_{alloc,mon}_capable() Tony Luck
2026-09-10 3:56 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-08-31 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 07/23] x86/resctrl: Add special case for Intel Haswell enumeration Tony Luck
2026-09-10 3:56 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-08-31 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 08/23] x86/resctrl: Delete rdt_alloc_capable and rdt_mon_capable Tony Luck
2026-09-10 3:57 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-08-31 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 09/23] fs/resctrl: Remove redundant calls to resctrl_mon_capable() Tony Luck
2026-09-10 3:57 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-08-31 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 10/23] x86/resctrl: Honor rdt=perf option to force enable AET perf events Tony Luck
2026-08-31 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 11/23] fs/resctrl: Add interface to disable a monitor event Tony Luck
2026-09-10 3:58 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-08-31 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 12/23] arm,x86,fs/resctrl: Handle change in number of RMIDs on each mount Tony Luck
2026-09-10 4:01 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-08-31 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 13/23] x86/resctrl: Handle systems when AET is the only resource Tony Luck
2026-09-10 4:04 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-08-31 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 14/23] x86/resctrl: Enforce system RMID limit on AET event groups Tony Luck
2026-09-10 4:05 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-08-31 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 15/23] x86/resctrl: Add PMT registration API for AET enumeration callbacks Tony Luck
2026-08-31 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 16/23] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Register enumeration functions with resctrl Tony Luck
2026-09-01 11:11 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-08-31 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 17/23] arm,x86/resctrl: Resolve INTEL_PMT_TELEMETRY symbols at runtime Tony Luck
2026-09-10 4:07 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2026-08-31 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 18/23] fs/resctrl: Call arch code for every mount Tony Luck
2026-09-10 4:07 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-08-31 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 19/23] x86/resctrl: Export interface to report telemetry unbind/remove Tony Luck
2026-09-10 4:08 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-08-31 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 20/23] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Inform resctrl when MMIO maps are being removed Tony Luck
2026-09-01 11:09 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-09-10 4:09 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-08-31 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 21/23] x86/resctrl: Require 64-bit x86 for resctrl support Tony Luck
2026-09-10 4:09 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-08-31 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 22/23] x86/resctrl: Simplify Kconfig options for resctrl Tony Luck
2026-09-10 4:09 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-08-31 17:44 ` [PATCH v11 23/23] x86/resctrl: Document telemetry mount timing caveat Tony Luck
2026-09-10 4:10 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-09-01 19:53 ` [PATCH v11 00/23] Allow AET to use PMT as loadable module Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3e81402c-902b-4499-8358-26077a8535ee@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=david.e.box@intel.com \
--cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®