From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1979432860C; Wed, 4 Feb 2026 20:09:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770235769; cv=none; b=VYS8JV06TLoW8USabST272AHCxh8ul72OE+2eV6wtGU9ihakA23IAu9lKbG9xCHcZuCLasqUqIqtXoDGmflBo4zJwyrDcHkANIzH5LuZC4Bld1LR3hH8Z/sYJ3SaN4W06yLyekAwpGjpVyyeRbYftWCKzdmHlUwRqNbdvtIO03E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770235769; c=relaxed/simple; bh=k+qGezpx+00xteF6OC7woXImRFPZPsNY2ZbZnx6ui6s=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=a3Yzb+sQLmH/tWwguwLs/MXnz8GWFa/ZQWPJuzBSEsATCOy4yuNxIZwUuAACn7cAYJQLesibkSuqlvxkmtvJHczPmAHZbiCrIw2Rn+uyLCivLeMU0wM7JgszqQS6CFnr0GLpv0qfton1SQ2CE5ZfWdD/x8yEPkaPvDju5SRXJd0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b=UfNKhxse; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="UfNKhxse" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=MWMRfXta7OMYbj99cPTkWB51I4qpj0rglPeJ8e1uFCs=; t=1770235769; x=1771445369; b=UfNKhxsed1m9poWVS/tqO5G5UbtGcMjn5c5ab9jsceXSf90 zml0HHxvQDWy8M9CmCgFjYElhvdfBoDRSt91c4tGMazMc9g7WIWsDk/fuJw3yuJa145Yf/5Z/vgdv KhN6GsNBe3DxM5WGcUWY1np//Irr1ZElcbOvS8bBWqQkJiBnJ+OSsTNPi2LdgeZRIp0RjsVxKfwrd 3AD1NQ42Snou/h6TV5dPK0ZnKSH3NyfHnZ4cjyh7N0ZV2DI4jwKW5nWQsnEp61KCtLDgo8nHCrpW6 J8TLX+SZjSkGbEc5aAPD80bSe7hhbhxa2vjPWaa4ccQvTLvIzWgvnTHelUONsiyQ==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vnjBm-0000000EcdB-2Om2; Wed, 04 Feb 2026 21:09:26 +0100 Message-ID: <3eaf27a486a80012b0be116e847f2e93f162aa1e.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/21] wifi: nxpwifi: create nxpwifi to support From: Johannes Berg To: Jeff Chen , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, briannorris@chromium.org, francesco@dolcini.it, s.hauer@pengutronix.de Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2026 21:09:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20260204180358.632281-1-jeff.chen_1@nxp.com> References: <20260204180358.632281-1-jeff.chen_1@nxp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.58.3 (3.58.3-1.fc43) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned >=20 > Devicetree bindings note > ------------------------ >=20 > The previous version included a devicetree binding document for > `nxp,iw61x.yaml`. Since Device Tree support for this device is option= al > and not required for current SDIO-based bring-up, the binding has bee= n > dropped from this series. A proper schema will be submitted separatel= y > once DT usage becomes relevant, so that binding review can be handled > in the correct subsystem and without blocking this driver introductio= n. You should probably have dropped _all_ the DT/OF *code* as well, otherwise what's the point of dropping the binding review when you still bake the binding into the code, no? johannes