From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B67EC3D967A for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2026 14:03:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788962590; cv=none; b=sfhEqgvi+sGz1SIghg2yTRu8kvLf1TSOXs6qWRlIwXYFMQT9y7PpD41Osgjw6rsgqOSTkrHbmBdJMDmpGpxUiUOuttqjOsI4YXBk1yK+42qf9xneJJVNCTjv4piLZrCsMmwuvUW4U49pDFB9jwfqBPEo1YgGEYuwmFpgLRy383Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788962590; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cd4JeYv5F5dPa0SI4hhDwoObMvk28qrjEPebQcnU2gY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=r/xTB1ofnaTqOG7KsHv1vpK1plmtYwoXEQ+3c2/mpURMb46zT0Oxvo4krIRyXaewWU2Z833DKS2QrTIWpwgbCKhKT0z/GNN2lZhu/ElhNAUkKtBZvoJooE1b9NOX9XCVWjgHmexyAWccmOGPkI8RGLqzoH/PBIrnMPsSLhICcG8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=WHysCADl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="WHysCADl" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1788962588; x=1820498588; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=cd4JeYv5F5dPa0SI4hhDwoObMvk28qrjEPebQcnU2gY=; b=WHysCADlSc+MtA5GPJ6qsDnyPpTdWtDQzb8yDnMiAJ8oQeBcpJetm7W4 WEsYUt2jNGJo76VRC5FEqbHxMZyiIK0BQ2KY+aBH2F9NFxH2VYzj0FQKD YiCMX2r72P8wYELUmyxDsyXce53ZKeCkLBRF+Vn+Q4r0EpoLTdgaWj08P c2DH+/JWSWTBv3WDbwXvPQCR/95Lh6ifr7OGsK+ap8mCAdeunfqPeVAUx JjSZDVMpBi0+jL+MI5Whjbb20lkJwkuC9QGS9aNMwJKnKYK/P2BBsJvC+ p+KIOlsekqygW7D4iv+X7fFAEiXH6cAR0QcfrlDxpG9p4ibEO2CS852ZI A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ucCTdMtuTailyXEXMelmmw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: DavlcyBUTtGqq7XQ5xhmDg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11900"; a="76948640" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,270,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="76948640" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by fmvoesa110.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Sep 2026 07:03:07 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ub7ontpfRMqfkJniY7VrCA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: cyj9KUgvQYCCAelxJzajEw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,270,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="265122705" Received: from fpallare-mobl4.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.20]) by fmviesa009-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Sep 2026 07:03:01 -0700 From: Jani Nikula To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Luca Ceresoli , Maarten Lankhorst , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Andrzej Hajda , Neil Armstrong , Robert Foss , Laurent Pinchart , Jonas Karlman , Jernej Skrabec , Jessica Zhang , Linus Walleij , Inki Dae , Jagan Teki , Marek Szyprowski , Albert Esteve , Anusha Srivatsa , Dmitry Baryshkov , Hui Pu , Ian Ray , Thomas Petazzoni , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ville =?utf-8?B?U3lyasOkbMOk?= Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 05/19] drm/panel: embed a drm_bridge into every drm_panel In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo, Finland References: <20260903-drm-bridge-every-panel-v2-0-2ab8ee24538e@bootlin.com> <20260903-drm-bridge-every-panel-v2-5-2ab8ee24538e@bootlin.com> <678ddef7e56703d9adffff5c490d4857af515343@intel.com> Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 17:02:58 +0300 Message-ID: <3efb06a30baae6ba1bfcf2be449bf207a30f674d@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, 09 Sep 2026, Maxime Ripard wrote: > I really wish i915 was at least *trying* to fit within the larger model > basically everybody else uses. I understand that it's a large > undertaking and regression prone and everything, but I'm also concerned > about having the "we can't because of i915" or "supported by everybody > else but i915" on a regular basis now. Okay, let's hear it, please name a few things where i915 is alone in doing something bonkers that amd, radeon, nouveau also don't do, and what would be the changes that would bring i915 closer to everybody else? BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel