From: "Remy Bohmer" <linux@bohmer.net>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [Question]: About FAT patent
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:25:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3efb10970803250325u18cc62fl582a39ec495296db@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hello All,
I found this site:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/01/11/microsoft_wins_patent_case/
Is the FAT support in the kernel sensible to this? And if so, why is
it still in the kernel?
Kind Regards,
Remy
reply other threads:[~2008-03-25 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3efb10970803250325u18cc62fl582a39ec495296db@mail.gmail.com \
--to=linux@bohmer.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®