From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752777Ab0CEOeK (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Mar 2010 09:34:10 -0500 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]:63229 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750874Ab0CEOeI convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Mar 2010 09:34:08 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=fntfIlZnMNXtWKc//+Jkiq4NA51RPMjln4CHWh/KO8RtpZrxEofyTEiYUj4o0jk5GK n2Cu3kT8RraOu0z3MbW+mkJcPqxuhO3Vqq7wCjznQiS20ovHjO6zA+Ogk2us07PcEOlF N/jEMx56uyixq0hIGMFYh8SL6Zn3SJCuzP624= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4B90E415.5090106@asladvancedsys.in> References: <4B868701.3010904@asladvancedsys.in> <3efb10971003050229na0fd4fbl128a890b0cf245c0@mail.gmail.com> <4B90E415.5090106@asladvancedsys.in> Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 15:34:06 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8861d6289d5b2828 Message-ID: <3efb10971003050634o37807a22tccd5c9416f3eb7a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Info on AT91 patches against mainline kernel From: Remy Bohmer To: Ravi Kumar Kulkarni Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@maxim.org.za Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, 2010/3/5 Ravi Kumar Kulkarni : > Hi Remy, >> >> You do not necessarily need the at91-patchset from Andrew. >> 2.6.33 works fine on at91sam9261 without it... >> >> Remy >> > > Thanks for the info. I will try to compile 2.6.33  now. But i got a mail > from andrew  that he updated at91 patchset to 2.6.32 . for clarification jus > verifying tat u mean  from 2.6.33 onwards  u  don't need at91 patches and > can directly compile without waiting Andrew's patchset . If tats case then > Andrew can update that in linux4samdotorg website so that it will be helpful You only need the changes from Andrew in case there is something in there that you require, you should look at the changelog to be sure. But, the at91sam9261 is already for several years in mainline and it works fine (even much older kernels than 2.6.33 will work without it, for example we used 2.6.24, 2.6.26, 2.6.31 without it), Andrews patchset is just a set of additional changes that will likely be pushed to mainline at some time. Remy