Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: net: bluetooth: qualcomm: add QCA9379 compatible

[Felix Kaechele <felix@kaechele.ca>]

Thanks for taking a look, Krzysztof.

In this case I think it would be easiest to just use the existing 
qca9377 fallback and drop his part of the patchset.

As for the supplies: For the particular module I am working with the 
supplies are mostly shared with the WiFi side. So it "just works" 
without taking care of supplies on the BT side.

But I agree it would be more correct to add and handle these as well. 
The documentation I have access to through the FCC filing of this module 
is not really conclusive of how to correctly name them in this context.
I would rather avoid submitting a patch with incorrect supply names.

Thanks again,
Felix

On 2024-08-05 01:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/08/2024 06:01, Felix Kaechele wrote:
>> Document that the QCA9379, as a member of the QCA6174 family, is
>> supported by the existing driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Felix Kaechele <felix@kaechele.ca>
>> ---
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/net/bluetooth/qualcomm-bluetooth.yaml   | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/bluetooth/qualcomm-bluetooth.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/bluetooth/qualcomm-bluetooth.yaml
>> index 68c5ed111417..f968b0d236e0 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/bluetooth/qualcomm-bluetooth.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/bluetooth/qualcomm-bluetooth.yaml
>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ properties:
>>         - qcom,qca2066-bt
>>         - qcom,qca6174-bt
>>         - qcom,qca9377-bt
>> +      - qcom,qca9379-bt
> 
> Then use fallback of 9377 or any other device. I still wonder why you do
> not require any supplies.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
>