Re: [PATCH drm-misc-next v9 01/11] drm/gem: fix lockdep check for dma-resv lock

[Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>]

On 8/8/23 09:21, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Thu,  3 Aug 2023 18:52:20 +0200
> Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> When no custom lock is set to protect a GEMs GPUVA list, lockdep checks
>> should fall back to the GEM objects dma-resv lock. With the current
>> implementation we're setting the lock_dep_map of the GEM objects 'resv'
>> pointer (in case no custom lock_dep_map is set yet) on
>> drm_gem_private_object_init().
>>
>> However, the GEM objects 'resv' pointer might still change after
>> drm_gem_private_object_init() is called, e.g. through
>> ttm_bo_init_reserved(). This can result in the wrong lock being tracked.
>>
>> To fix this, call dma_resv_held() directly from
>> drm_gem_gpuva_assert_lock_held() and fall back to the GEMs lock_dep_map
>> pointer only if an actual custom lock is set.
>>
>> Fixes: e6303f323b1a ("drm: manager to keep track of GPUs VA mappings")
>> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
> 
> but I'm wondering if it wouldn't be a good thing to add a
> drm_gem_set_resv() helper, so the core can control drm_gem_object::resv
> re-assignments (block them if it's happening after the GEM has been
> exposed to the outside world or update auxiliary data if it's happening
> before that).

I agree, this might be a good idea. There are quite a few places where 
drm_gem_object::resv is set from external code.

> 
>> ---
>>   include/drm/drm_gem.h | 15 +++++++++------
>>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_gem.h b/include/drm/drm_gem.h
>> index c0b13c43b459..bc9f6aa2f3fe 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/drm_gem.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_gem.h
>> @@ -551,15 +551,17 @@ int drm_gem_evict(struct drm_gem_object *obj);
>>    * @lock: the lock used to protect the gpuva list. The locking primitive
>>    * must contain a dep_map field.
>>    *
>> - * Call this if you're not proctecting access to the gpuva list
>> - * with the dma-resv lock, otherwise, drm_gem_gpuva_init() takes care
>> - * of initializing lock_dep_map for you.
>> + * Call this if you're not proctecting access to the gpuva list with the
>> + * dma-resv lock, but with a custom lock.
>>    */
>>   #define drm_gem_gpuva_set_lock(obj, lock) \
>> -	if (!(obj)->gpuva.lock_dep_map) \
>> +	if (!WARN((obj)->gpuva.lock_dep_map, \
>> +		  "GEM GPUVA lock should be set only once.")) \
>>   		(obj)->gpuva.lock_dep_map = &(lock)->dep_map
>>   #define drm_gem_gpuva_assert_lock_held(obj) \
>> -	lockdep_assert(lock_is_held((obj)->gpuva.lock_dep_map))
>> +	lockdep_assert((obj)->gpuva.lock_dep_map ? \
>> +		       lock_is_held((obj)->gpuva.lock_dep_map) : \
>> +		       dma_resv_held((obj)->resv))
>>   #else
>>   #define drm_gem_gpuva_set_lock(obj, lock) do {} while (0)
>>   #define drm_gem_gpuva_assert_lock_held(obj) do {} while (0)
>> @@ -573,11 +575,12 @@ int drm_gem_evict(struct drm_gem_object *obj);
>>    *
>>    * Calling this function is only necessary for drivers intending to support the
>>    * &drm_driver_feature DRIVER_GEM_GPUVA.
>> + *
>> + * See also drm_gem_gpuva_set_lock().
>>    */
>>   static inline void drm_gem_gpuva_init(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
>>   {
>>   	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&obj->gpuva.list);
>> -	drm_gem_gpuva_set_lock(obj, &obj->resv->lock.base);
>>   }
>>   
>>   /**
>