From: "Jaswinder Singh" <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>
To: hufey <hufeyy@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
randy.dunlap@oracle.com, efault@gmx.de,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: realtime preemption performance difference
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:41:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3f9a31f40709260011i1416d287h5d0da001dd77fbfb@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <88dfed9d0709241427v329aeed9jfbc298666ac483c8@mail.gmail.com>
hello hufey,
I am not using montavista kernel, I am using standard linux kernel.
Realtime is known by worst case latencies. Ingo and team are claiming
for realtime support so their should be some samples and performance
numbers,
Can someone please share their samples and/or numbers.
Thank you,
Jaswinder Singh.
On 9/25/07, hufey <hufeyy@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/24/07, Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I want to check performance difference by using realtime preemption patch :
> >
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/
> >
> > Please let me know from where I can download samples to test realtime
> > preemption performance difference.
> >
>
> As far as I know, some embedded linux vendors such as MontaVista
> provide kernel patch to export some interfaces to measure realtime
> performance.
>
> > Can someone please share performance numbers for your hardware:-
> >
> > 1. Interrupt latency
> > 2. Task switching time
> > 3. hard-realtime scheduling latency
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Jaswinder Singh.
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-26 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-24 11:48 Jaswinder Singh
2007-09-24 21:27 ` hufey
2007-09-26 7:11 ` Jaswinder Singh [this message]
2007-09-26 11:17 ` Ankita Garg
2007-09-26 13:30 ` Ankita Garg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3f9a31f40709260011i1416d287h5d0da001dd77fbfb@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jaswinderlinux@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=hufeyy@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®