From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932639AbXK3MIv (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:08:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754357AbXK3MIm (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:08:42 -0500 Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.225]:12317 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754126AbXK3MIl (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:08:41 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hcn2ztfic2qH9de5hWcCDnfhSP0a+xRN0XXXtI5zEo2KHYO4UgCdZ/erZifOgx6wPZCaPk9XC/e+7FQgDOqkqiWmj2NUsA0CGUBgELgPhNFEZw0u4V3jsrPsovPt0iRN9bX5I4nLrYCZ6Sx/T44O+sAEbvCNGYevPm+a+R8ufro= Message-ID: <3f9a31f40711300408s4341a338n33e5b6dbaee05813@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:38:39 +0530 From: "Jaswinder Singh" To: "Heiko Carstens" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3 x86 make depends on s390 arch Cc: LKML , "Jan Glauber" In-Reply-To: <20071130115015.GC11682@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <3f9a31f40711300014y576e83dldfafa340eec257f0@mail.gmail.com> <3f9a31f40711300303l3260c3e7s4c35884f5e1fa6e1@mail.gmail.com> <20071130115015.GC11682@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/30/07, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 04:33:19PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote: > > This patch fixes s390 dependency for x86 > > > > Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh > > Deleting random parts of the kernel tree is actually not > supported. > I agree with you. I just did this to same some space because I keep many kernel trees. But i am curious if other arch do not depends on x86 then s390 ? > > diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig > > index 1330061..b699ed5 100644 > > --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig > > @@ -537,4 +537,6 @@ source "security/Kconfig" > > > > source "crypto/Kconfig" > > > > +source "arch/s390/crypto/Kconfig" > > + > > With this there's no dependency on CRYPTO_HW anymore. > Anyhow "if CRYPTO_HW" is not working in drivers/crypto/Kconfig have you tested this patch on S390. Is this giving errors ? And you can also add depends with CRYPTO_HW in arch/s390/crypto/Kconfig Thank you, Jaswinder Singh. > > +#ifdef CONFIG_S390 > > #include "../arch/s390/appldata/appldata.h" > > +#endif > > This include can go away. > > Since this pops up again and again we'll come up with a patch to fix this. >