From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753513AbYLSUlU (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:41:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751561AbYLSUlJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:41:09 -0500 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.233]:40832 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750833AbYLSUlF (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:41:05 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=Um9nRgQ8qz/ezEoRKo6GLt5ZFM5I90jfRCNsSKGXwZxmMKa1pawtsmHg36i8Z84ptH 5OYodUFj7UGsc9uoPHSSf1Js1MzUFGU0k+PJJrZ/Ce3v0bL9gc3V5SiHCoRKYnEzAJs2 A4H+gmA4wCpvLGmxwCuUX1yMwpKw8Jvp3wBvo= Message-ID: <3f9a31f40812191241q40dafdb0lfd2f4487f2870e2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 02:11:04 +0530 From: "Jaswinder Singh" To: "James Bottomley" Subject: Re: Firmware patches for SCSI Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, LKML , sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, "David Woodhouse" In-Reply-To: <1229718543.18778.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <3f9a31f40812191153n636888f4i549409453266d58c@mail.gmail.com> <1229718543.18778.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello James, On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 1:59 AM, James Bottomley wrote: > > Um ... depends how they got into linux-next. The head commit just says > They got into linux-next via David Woodhouse. : http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/firmware-2.6.git > Merge commit 'firmware/master' > > Which isn't very descriptive of where it came from. It looks like > either a tree that linux-next shouldn't pull (or one the owner forgot to > push to linus). > Earlier due to Firmware issues firmware patches are going directly though David Woodhouse. Now firmware issues are solved so David wants that the _driver_ patches should be sent directly to the appropriate maintainers / mailing lists. So I am curious that should I resend these patches based on which git tree. Thank you, Jaswinder Singh.