From: "Jaswinder Singh Rajput" <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>, "Bryan Donlan" <bdonlan@gmail.com>,
"Ingo Brueckl" <ib@wupperonline.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: x86 (Linux Tiny): configure out support for some processors
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 21:43:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3f9a31f40901020813t136ad2ceif1092f312866a0ce@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11444.1230910752@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:09 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 20:40:16 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput said:
>
>> If I know what is my CPU there is no point for supporting all related
>> CPUs in my kernel.
>
> EMBEDDED is for a large assortment of things, all of which are of the form:
>
> General users won't want to change Y, but if I know I don't need Y, there is
> no point in supporting Y in the kernel.
>
On 64 bit AMD machine I was getting :
[ 0.000000] KERNEL supported cpus:
[ 0.000000] Intel GenuineIntel
[ 0.000000] AMD AuthenticAMD
[ 0.000000] Centaur CentaurHauls
By using the following patch I get rid of extra CPU support and also
reduces size of the kernel.
Let me know why should I choose EMBEDDED option ? I know I am not
using Embbeded machine and I do not need embbeded features on my
machine. If I am willing to go North why should I go South first ?
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig.cpu
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig.cpu
@@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ config X86_DEBUGCTLMSR
depends on !(MK6 || MWINCHIPC6 || MWINCHIP3D || MCYRIXIII ||
M586MMX || M586TSC || M586 || M486 || M386)
menuconfig PROCESSOR_SELECT
- bool "Supported processor vendors" if EMBEDDED
+ bool "Supported processor vendors"
help
This lets you choose what x86 vendor support code your kernel
will include.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-02 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-01 20:37 Ingo Brueckl
2009-01-02 5:19 ` Bryan Donlan
2009-01-02 5:59 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-01-02 9:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-02 15:10 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-01-02 15:39 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-01-02 16:13 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput [this message]
2009-01-02 16:20 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-01-02 16:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-02 16:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-02 16:38 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-01-02 17:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-02 18:13 ` Replace CONFIG_EMBEDDED [Was: x86 (Linux Tiny): configure out support for some processor] Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-02 19:02 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-01-02 19:31 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-02 16:51 ` x86 (Linux Tiny): configure out support for some processors david
2009-01-02 16:26 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-01-02 18:54 ` david
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3f9a31f40901020813t136ad2ceif1092f312866a0ce@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jaswinderlinux@gmail.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=bdonlan@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ib@wupperonline.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome