From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
hskinnemoen@atmel.com, cooloney@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
ralf@linux-mips.org, dhowells@redhat.com, matthew@wil.cx,
chris@zankel.net, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull -tip] headers_check fixes for other architectures
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 23:01:41 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3f9a31f40902010931p24cbfabekec442078914e3d6e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090201172018.GB21913@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 05:49:15PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>>
>> > > These patches fixes 41 headers_check warnings as shown in first email.
>> >
>> > Pulled into tip/core/header-fixes, thanks Jaswinder!
>>
>> These are the remaining ones on x86:
>>
>> 17 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h
>> 12 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/linux/soundcard.h
>> 6 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/asm/setup.h
>> 3 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/linux/nubus.h
>> 2 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/linux/in6.h
>> 1 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/mtd/jffs2-user.h
>> 1 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/linux/socket.h
>> 1 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/linux/coda_psdev.h
>> 1 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/asm/prctl.h
>>
>> They are all of the "extern's make no sense in userspace" type. What was the
>> verdict, are they worth touching, or should we turn off this warning in
>> 'make headers_check'?
>
> Ah, not a case of new-cc's added. A case of the rare event of non-spam
> eminating from hera.kernel.org falling foul of my manual local blacklist.
>
> I'd appreciate it if someone could point me at the original patches
> being discussed.
I am sorry, if you did not received the email but you was in CC list:
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
hskinnemoen@atmel.com,
cooloney@kernel.org,
tony.luck@intel.com,
ralf@linux-mips.org,
dhowells@redhat.com,
matthew@wil.cx,
chris@zankel.net,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Arms bits are :
These are clean patches, I did not included anything which leads to any
confusion or conflicts. I hope maintainers do not mind if these patches
go to mainstream via Ingo's -tip along with other headers_check fixes.
Jaswinder Singh Rajput (3):
headers_check fix: arm, a.out.h
headers_check fix: arm, setup.h
headers_check fix: arm, swab.h
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/a.out.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/a.out.h
index 79489fd..083894b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/a.out.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/a.out.h
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
#define __ARM_A_OUT_H__
#include <linux/personality.h>
-#include <asm/types.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
struct exec
{
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/setup.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/setup.h
index f2cd18a..ee1304f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/setup.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/setup.h
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
#ifndef __ASMARM_SETUP_H
#define __ASMARM_SETUP_H
-#include <asm/types.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
#define COMMAND_LINE_SIZE 1024
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/swab.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/swab.h
index 27a689b..ca2bf2f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/swab.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/swab.h
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
#define __ASM_ARM_SWAB_H
#include <linux/compiler.h>
-#include <asm/types.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
#if !defined(__STRICT_ANSI__) || defined(__KERNEL__)
# define __SWAB_64_THRU_32__
Thanks,
--
JSR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-01 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-31 7:10 Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-01-31 16:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-01 6:30 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-01 10:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-01 16:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-01 17:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-01 17:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-01 17:31 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput [this message]
2009-02-01 18:33 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-02 17:11 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-02-02 18:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-02 18:29 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-02-02 18:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-05 17:55 ` Tony Luck
2009-02-05 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-05 19:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 2:06 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 2:14 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-02-06 2:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 14:18 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 14:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 14:34 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 14:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 14:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 15:00 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 15:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 15:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 17:24 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-06 17:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 18:11 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 18:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-06 19:31 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-08 5:50 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-09 12:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 8:19 ` [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-06 8:53 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 9:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-06 14:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 15:29 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 15:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 15:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 15:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 16:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 15:48 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 15:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 16:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 16:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 17:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 17:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 17:32 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-06 17:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 18:53 ` Luck, Tony
2009-02-06 13:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3f9a31f40902010931p24cbfabekec442078914e3d6e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jaswinderlinux@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=cooloney@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hskinnemoen@atmel.com \
--cc=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®