mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.garry@linux.dev>
To: Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iomap: remove the atomic write length check in iomap_dio_bio_iter_one()
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2026 17:06:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3fc46788-d86d-44c5-8606-385d96fede4d@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261107-blkdev-atomic-bounce-v1-2-f66344262096@columbia.edu>

On 11/8/26 04:24, Tal Zussman wrote:
> bio_iov_iter_get_pages() and bio_iov_iter_bounce_write() now fail a
> REQ_ATOMIC bio that doesn't cover the whole iterator, so the bio here
> always covers iomap_length() and the check can't trigger. Remove the
> check.
> 
> Suggested-by: John Garry <john.garry@linux.dev>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/82978d5c-3e08-48e9-bf0a-7913e1cd0507@linux.dev/
> Signed-off-by: Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu>

Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@linux.dev>

This looks ok. But I am just thinking that a CoW-based atomic write does 
not have the single bio restriction, so we don't need to fail the atomic 
in this case. However, we should have consistent rules for iovec's 
whether it's a block device or regular file for ext4 or xfs, so this 
makes sense.

thanks

BTW, you could be a real hero and add an xfstests case for this also.

> ---
>   fs/iomap/direct-io.c | 14 --------------
>   1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> index ad041ac3252a..aca7cbaea4af 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> @@ -370,15 +370,6 @@ static ssize_t iomap_dio_bio_iter_one(struct iomap_iter *iter,
>   		goto out_put_bio;
>   	ret = bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
>   
> -	/*
> -	 * An atomic write bio must cover the complete length.  If it doesn't,
> -	 * error out.
> -	 */
> -	if ((op & REQ_ATOMIC) && WARN_ON_ONCE(ret != iomap_length(iter))) {
> -		ret = -EINVAL;
> -		goto out_bio_release_pages;
> -	}
> -
>   	if (dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_WRITE)
>   		task_io_account_write(ret);
>   	else if ((dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_USER_BACKED) &&
> @@ -393,11 +384,6 @@ static ssize_t iomap_dio_bio_iter_one(struct iomap_iter *iter,
>   	iomap_dio_submit_bio(iter, dio, bio, pos);
>   	return ret;
>   
> -out_bio_release_pages:
> -	if (dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_BOUNCE)
> -		bio_free_folios(bio);
> -	else
> -		bio_release_pages(bio, false);
>   out_put_bio:
>   	bio_put(bio);
>   	return ret;
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-08 17:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-08  4:24 [PATCH 0/2] block: fail short atomic bounce bios in bio_iov_iter_bounce_write() Tal Zussman
2026-11-08  4:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: fail a short atomic bounce " Tal Zussman
2026-11-08 17:13   ` John Garry
2026-11-08  4:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] iomap: remove the atomic write length check in iomap_dio_bio_iter_one() Tal Zussman
2026-11-08 17:06   ` John Garry [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3fc46788-d86d-44c5-8606-385d96fede4d@linux.dev \
    --to=john.garry@linux.dev \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tz2294@columbia.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®