From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>, <ohad@wizery.com>,
<bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>, <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
Cc: <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>, <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/16] remoteproc: stm32: Move resource table setup to rproc_ops
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:14:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3fe71628-d37a-94f5-3d08-132b0b0cf0f6@foss.st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210223233515.3468677-7-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
On 2/24/21 12:35 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Move the setting of the resource table installed by an external
> entity to rproc_ops::get_loaded_rsc_table(). This is to support
> scenarios where a remote processor has been started by the core
> but is detached at a later stage. To re-attach the remote
> processor, the address of the resource table needs to be available
> at a later time than the platform driver's probe() function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
Thanks,
Arnaud
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 141 +++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> index ccb3c14a0023..f647e565014b 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> @@ -546,6 +546,73 @@ static void stm32_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
> }
> }
>
> +static int stm32_rproc_da_to_pa(struct rproc *rproc,
> + u64 da, phys_addr_t *pa)
> +{
> + struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
> + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
> + struct stm32_rproc_mem *p_mem;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ddata->nb_rmems; i++) {
> + p_mem = &ddata->rmems[i];
> +
> + if (da < p_mem->dev_addr ||
> + da >= p_mem->dev_addr + p_mem->size)
> + continue;
> +
> + *pa = da - p_mem->dev_addr + p_mem->bus_addr;
> + dev_dbg(dev, "da %llx to pa %#x\n", da, *pa);
> +
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + dev_err(dev, "can't translate da %llx\n", da);
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static struct resource_table *
> +stm32_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, size_t *table_sz)
> +{
> + struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
> + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
> + phys_addr_t rsc_pa;
> + u32 rsc_da;
> + int err;
> +
> + /* The resource table has already been mapped, nothing to do */
> + if (ddata->rsc_va)
> + goto done;
> +
> + err = regmap_read(ddata->rsctbl.map, ddata->rsctbl.reg, &rsc_da);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to read rsc tbl addr\n");
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + }
> +
> + if (!rsc_da)
> + /* no rsc table */
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> +
> + err = stm32_rproc_da_to_pa(rproc, rsc_da, &rsc_pa);
> + if (err)
> + return ERR_PTR(err);
> +
> + ddata->rsc_va = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, rsc_pa, RSC_TBL_SIZE);
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ddata->rsc_va)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Unable to map memory region: %pa+%zx\n",
> + &rsc_pa, RSC_TBL_SIZE);
> + ddata->rsc_va = NULL;
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> + }
> +
> +done:
> + /* Assuming the resource table fits in 1kB is fair */
> + *table_sz = RSC_TBL_SIZE;
> + return (struct resource_table *)ddata->rsc_va;
> +}
> +
> static const struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = {
> .start = stm32_rproc_start,
> .stop = stm32_rproc_stop,
> @@ -554,6 +621,7 @@ static const struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = {
> .load = rproc_elf_load_segments,
> .parse_fw = stm32_rproc_parse_fw,
> .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
> + .get_loaded_rsc_table = stm32_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table,
> .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check,
> .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
> };
> @@ -695,75 +763,6 @@ static int stm32_rproc_get_m4_status(struct stm32_rproc *ddata,
> return regmap_read(ddata->m4_state.map, ddata->m4_state.reg, state);
> }
>
> -static int stm32_rproc_da_to_pa(struct platform_device *pdev,
> - struct stm32_rproc *ddata,
> - u64 da, phys_addr_t *pa)
> -{
> - struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> - struct stm32_rproc_mem *p_mem;
> - unsigned int i;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < ddata->nb_rmems; i++) {
> - p_mem = &ddata->rmems[i];
> -
> - if (da < p_mem->dev_addr ||
> - da >= p_mem->dev_addr + p_mem->size)
> - continue;
> -
> - *pa = da - p_mem->dev_addr + p_mem->bus_addr;
> - dev_dbg(dev, "da %llx to pa %#x\n", da, *pa);
> -
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - dev_err(dev, "can't translate da %llx\n", da);
> -
> - return -EINVAL;
> -}
> -
> -static int stm32_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct platform_device *pdev,
> - struct rproc *rproc,
> - struct stm32_rproc *ddata)
> -{
> - struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> - phys_addr_t rsc_pa;
> - u32 rsc_da;
> - int err;
> -
> - err = regmap_read(ddata->rsctbl.map, ddata->rsctbl.reg, &rsc_da);
> - if (err) {
> - dev_err(dev, "failed to read rsc tbl addr\n");
> - return err;
> - }
> -
> - if (!rsc_da)
> - /* no rsc table */
> - return 0;
> -
> - err = stm32_rproc_da_to_pa(pdev, ddata, rsc_da, &rsc_pa);
> - if (err)
> - return err;
> -
> - ddata->rsc_va = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, rsc_pa, RSC_TBL_SIZE);
> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ddata->rsc_va)) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Unable to map memory region: %pa+%zx\n",
> - &rsc_pa, RSC_TBL_SIZE);
> - ddata->rsc_va = NULL;
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * The resource table is already loaded in device memory, no need
> - * to work with a cached table.
> - */
> - rproc->cached_table = NULL;
> - /* Assuming the resource table fits in 1kB is fair */
> - rproc->table_sz = RSC_TBL_SIZE;
> - rproc->table_ptr = (struct resource_table *)ddata->rsc_va;
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -803,10 +802,6 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ret = stm32_rproc_parse_memory_regions(rproc);
> if (ret)
> goto free_resources;
> -
> - ret = stm32_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(pdev, rproc, ddata);
> - if (ret)
> - goto free_resources;
> }
>
> rproc->has_iommu = false;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-26 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-23 23:34 [PATCH v6 00/16] remoteproc: Add support for detaching a remote processor Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 01/16] remoteproc: Remove useless check in rproc_del() Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 02/16] remoteproc: Rename function rproc_actuate() Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 03/16] remoteproc: Add new RPROC_ATTACHED state Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 04/16] remoteproc: Properly represent the attached state Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 05/16] remoteproc: Add new get_loaded_rsc_table() to rproc_ops Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:14 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-03-01 18:03 ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 06/16] remoteproc: stm32: Move resource table setup " Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:14 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN [this message]
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 07/16] remoteproc: stm32: Move memory parsing " Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 08/16] remoteproc: Add new detach() remoteproc operation Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 09/16] remoteproc: Introduce function __rproc_detach() Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:15 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 10/16] remoteproc: Introduce function rproc_detach() Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:15 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 11/16] remoteproc: Properly deal with the resource table when attached Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:21 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-03-01 18:41 ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 12/16] remoteproc: Properly deal with a kernel panic " Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 13/16] remoteproc: Properly deal with a start request " Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 14/16] remoteproc: Properly deal with a stop " Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:21 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 15/16] remoteproc: Properly deal with a detach " Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:21 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 16/16] remoteproc: Refactor rproc delete and cdev release path Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:23 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-03-01 18:58 ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:40 ` [PATCH v6 00/16] remoteproc: Add support for detaching a remote processor Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-03-01 18:58 ` Mathieu Poirier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3fe71628-d37a-94f5-3d08-132b0b0cf0f6@foss.st.com \
--to=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®