From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 12:39:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 12:39:28 -0500 Received: from smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.4.61]:21673 "EHLO smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 12:39:27 -0500 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20030108124514.02d6f1d0@pop.rcn.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 12:53:57 -0500 To: apache-modules@covalent.net From: Charles Reitzel Subject: Re: [apache-modules] Best HTML Parser Cc: apache-modules@covalent.net, DCOM , Linux Kernel , modssl-users@modssl.org, netfilter@lists.netfilter.org, TEAMICE In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20030108124223.009f3e00@mail.SoftHome.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I am partial to HTML Tidy for a few reasons: 1) cross-platform, reentrant C library 2) very forgiving of sloppy, malformed markup 3) produces clean markup - XHTML if requested 4) C++, Perl, Pascal, COM and .NET bindings available, others easily done with SWIG But I must admit, as one of the primary developers, I am probably biased. But if you need to get your markup cleaned up so that you can apply XML tools to it, it is probably the best game in town. For more info: http://tidy.sourceforge.net/ take it easy, Charlie At 12:43 PM 1/8/2003 +0530, Blesson Paul wrote: >Hi all > Which is the Best HTML Parser in C/C++ > >regards >Blesson Paul