From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>,
Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Alternative][PATCH] ACPI / PCI: Set root bridge ACPI handle in advance, v2
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 22:53:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4001131.iQGP87KxgR@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9771783.0zXIGEmDYn@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Thursday, January 10, 2013 01:05:24 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 09, 2013 03:27:29 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, January 09, 2013 03:16:59 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > >> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > >> >
> > >> > The ACPI handles of PCI root bridges need to be known to
> > >> > acpi_bind_one(), so that it can create the appropriate
> > >> > "firmware_node" and "physical_node" files for them, but currently
> > >> > the way it gets to know those handles is not exactly straightforward
> > >> > (to put it lightly).
> > >> >
> > >> > This is how it works, roughly:
> > >> >
> > >> > 1. acpi_bus_scan() finds the handle of a PCI root bridge,
> > >> > creates a struct acpi_device object for it and passes that
> > >> > object to acpi_pci_root_add().
> > >> >
> > >> > 2. acpi_pci_root_add() creates a struct acpi_pci_root object,
> > >> > populates its "device" field with its argument's address
> > >> > (device->handle is the ACPI handle found in step 1).
> > >> >
> > >> > 3. The struct acpi_pci_root object created in step 2 is passed
> > >> > to pci_acpi_scan_root() and used to get resources that are
> > >> > passed to pci_create_root_bus().
> > >> >
> > >> > 4. pci_create_root_bus() creates a struct pci_host_bridge object
> > >> > and passes its "dev" member to device_register().
> > >> >
> > >> > 5. platform_notify(), which for systems with ACPI is set to
> > >> > acpi_platform_notify(), is called.
> > >> >
> > >> > So far, so good. Now it starts to be "interesting".
> > >> >
> > >> > 6. acpi_find_bridge_device() is used to find the ACPI handle of
> > >> > the given device (which is the PCI root bridge) and executes
> > >> > acpi_pci_find_root_bridge(), among other things, for the
> > >> > given device object.
> > >> >
> > >> > 7. acpi_pci_find_root_bridge() uses the name (sic!) of the given
> > >> > device object to extract the segment and bus numbers of the PCI
> > >> > root bridge and passes them to acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle().
> > >> >
> > >> > 8. acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle() browses the list of ACPI PCI
> > >> > root bridges and finds the one that matches the given segment
> > >> > and bus numbers. Its handle is then used to initialize the
> > >> > ACPI handle of the PCI root bridge's device object by
> > >> > acpi_bind_one(). However, this is *exactly* the ACPI handle we
> > >> > started with in step 1.
> > >> >
> > >> > Needless to say, this is quite embarassing, but it may be avoided
> > >> > thanks to commit f3fd0c8 (ACPI: Allow ACPI handles of devices to be
> > >> > initialized in advance), which makes it possible to initialize the
> > >> > ACPI handle of a device before passing it to device_register().
> > >> >
> > >> > Accordingly, add a new __weak routine, pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(),
> > >> > defaulting to an empty implementation that can be replaced by the
> > >> > interested architecutres (x86 and ia64 at the moment) with functions
> > >> > that will set the root bridge's ACPI handle before its dev member is
> > >> > passed to device_register(). Make both x86 and ia64 provide such
> > >> > implementations of pcibios_root_bridge_prepare() and remove
> > >> > acpi_pci_find_root_bridge() and acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle() that
> > >> > aren't necessary any more.
> > >> >
> > >> > Included is a fix for breakage on systems with non-ACPI PCI host
> > >> > bridges from Bjorn Helgaas.
> > >> >
> > >> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > >>
> > >> Looks good to me!
> > >>
> > >> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > I'll wait for comments from the others, if any, and put it into my acpi-scan
> > > branch after a couple of days. It doesn't need to be there technically, but
> > > it's kind of related.
> >
> > I tested it with acpi-scan and pci-root-bus-hotplug patchset, and it works well.
> > so
> > Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
>
> Thanks!
>
> > BTW, found one left over of change about ->acpi_handle==> ACPI_HANDLE..
>
> Can you please submit that patch with a proper changelog?
>
> It is a mainline bug now (and a build regression for that matter), so I'd like to
> push the fix to Linus for v3.8-rc4.
May I have your sign-off for the patch below at least?
Rafael
> > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/glue.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/glue.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/glue.c
> > @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static int acpi_platform_notify(struct d
> > if (!ret) {
> > struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
> >
> > - acpi_get_name(dev->acpi_handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
> > + acpi_get_name(ACPI_HANDLE(dev), ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
> > DBG("Device %s -> %s\n", dev_name(dev), (char *)buffer.pointer);
> > kfree(buffer.pointer);
> > } else
> >
> >
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-11 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-16 22:25 [PATCH] ACPI / PCI: Set root bridge ACPI handle in advance Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-12-17 5:27 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-12-17 7:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-12-17 8:09 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-12-17 12:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-12-17 12:20 ` [Update][PATCH] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-12-17 17:24 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-12-17 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-12-17 18:44 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-12-17 23:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-12-17 23:30 ` [Update 2][PATCH] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-12-20 21:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-12-20 21:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-12-20 22:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-12-21 0:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-12-25 22:42 ` [Alternative][PATCH] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-12-26 18:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-12-26 22:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-12-26 20:04 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-12-26 20:10 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-12-26 20:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-12-26 20:41 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-12-26 22:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-12-27 0:10 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-12-27 12:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-12-27 13:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-12-27 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-12-27 21:32 ` [Alternative 2][PATCH] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-02 23:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-03 0:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-03 12:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-03 21:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-03 22:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-03 22:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-04 1:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-04 11:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-05 0:03 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-05 0:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-05 0:19 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-05 0:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-05 0:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-03 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-09 21:33 ` [Alternative][PATCH] ACPI / PCI: Set root bridge ACPI handle in advance, v2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-09 22:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-09 23:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-09 23:27 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-10 0:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-11 21:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-01-11 23:01 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-10 22:54 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-10 23:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-11 12:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4001131.iQGP87KxgR@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=myron.stowe@redhat.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®