Hello, Andrew Morton wrote: >>i2o-cleanup.patch: > I get 100% rejects applying this. Could you resend it as an attachment? Okey, another try, this time as attachment. >>--- drivers/message/i2o.old/i2o_core.c 2004-01-17 22:47:00.000000000 +0100 >>+++ drivers/message/i2o/i2o_core.c 2004-01-17 23:34:43.866973586 +0100 > Also, this renaming arrangement breaks my scripts (at least). Preferable > would be: > --- a/drivers/message/i2o/i2o_core.c > +++ b/drivers/message/i2o/i2o_core.c Good to know, i hopefully fixed that, too. >>maintainer for those module, i wrote to the kernel mailing list. Can >>anybody tell me, who i can contact to verify if my changes are of any >>value? I want to contribute some more code, because on my system the >>i2o_block doesn't work too. But before, i want to be sure that my code is >>needed and also is good enough to be included into the kernel. > I think that would be Alan Cox Thank you very much for your help! Best regards, Markus Lidel ------------------------------------------ Markus Lidel (Senior IT Consultant) Shadow Connect GmbH Carl-Reisch-Weg 12 D-86381 Krumbach Germany Phone: +49 82 82/99 51-0 Fax: +49 82 82/99 51-11 E-Mail: Markus.Lidel@shadowconnect.com URL: http://www.shadowconnect.com